I’ll be back
I'll be gone for a few days. A trip to the Philippines. I don't know how much posting I'll be able to do while I'm there. It's a pleasure trip. But I'll be back by the 1st of June envigorated, ready to take up the battle once again, and confident that Bush and Maliki will be able to keep things under control while I'm gone. You have to admit, they haven't been doing all that badly of late. Fingers are crossed for Iraq, but you know -- things look better than they have in a long time.
Here’s My Idiot Of the Week
Tuesday I was taking a few minutes while in the car to listen to KDKA radio and Fred Honsberger who had as his guest a man who is causing quite a stir. Mike Norman proprietor of Mulligan’s in Marietta Georgia is one of those racists who think that he is just a little too smart to be caught being a racist. Unfortunately for him, he is wrong - he’s not that smart.
Mr. Norman is selling t-shirts with what is clearly the head and upper body of a monkey holding a banana which say “Obama in ‘08”. While Honsberger was interviewing this mental midget he continually denied that the image was that of a monkey (curiously similar to Curious George) and saw absolutely nothing wrong with the inference that “monkeys”, read black people, are for Obama.
Yes, black people seem to be curiously voting for Obama who also happens to be black in percentages far greater than women are supporting Hillary and white people are support either Hillary or McCain but that is another issue. Calling them monkeys is beyond the pale.
He ducked and dodged the line of questioning claiming that it was Honsberger that must have some sort of chip on his shoulder, etc. and eventually hung up like your typical racist caught arguing with someone ten times smarter than him.
Mike Norman is the sort of retard that gives the race baiters (like Obama, Sharpton, Jackson, etc.) ammunition to throw at people making reasonable and clear comments on their actions.
But you don’t have to take my word for what the shirt looks like. You can see it for yourself and make your own judgment.

Everyone’s A Fascist Except The Fascist
Left wingers all around the world never like to be called left wingers. Hugo Chavez is a prime example. Even though he proudly promotes fascist socialism, he goes to extreme lengths to trash other people as fascists:
CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Sunday almost told German Chancellor Angela Merkel to go to hell, but stopped short of insulting the woman leader on Mother’s Day.
Instead he called her a political descendant of Adolf Hitler and German fascism.
“Ms. Chancellor, you can go to …,” he said, pausing for effect and eliciting giggles from the audience, a group of military officers, cabinet ministers and government officials. “Because she’s a woman I won’t say anything else.”
Ok, yeah Germany has some socialist tendencies but for Hugo Chavez to continually project his own beliefs on others is humorous. This is a man that has nationalized industry, confiscated private property, is a de facto dictator, promotes a Venezuela against the world mentality and shuts down television stations that disagree with him.
For reference fascism is defined as: “a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual” … check … “and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader,” … check … “severe economic and social regimentation,” … check … “and forcible suppression of opposition” … and check!
Hugo, look in the mirror. You sir area a fascist.
On to the next
In the Wall Street Journal's assessment, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki's gamble to take on the Shiite militias has paid off in spades.
The early setbacks might easily have emboldened Mr. Sadr, caused the Iraqi army to crumble and led to the end of Mr. Maliki's government.
Instead, Mr. Maliki and Iraqi forces persevered. And two months later, hundreds of Mahdi Army fighters have been arrested and weapons caches found. Following the model of the U.S. surge in Baghdad, Basra's streets are far safer thanks to the visible presence of 33,000 Iraqi troops. The Mahdi vice squads that terrorized the city's population are gone. The U.S. and Britain provided air support during the early stages of the operation, and continue to provide advisory support. But the Basra operation has clearly been an Iraqi success.
Something similar also seems to be happening in Baghdad's Sadr City neighborhood, long a stronghold for the Mahdi Army. Initial press reports have suggested the battle has mostly come out a draw. But a 14-point "truce" between the government and the Mahdists (brokered last week by Iran) suggests otherwise.
Similarly optimistic news has made its way to the pages of the New York Times in an account by Amman Karim, who paid a visit to Basra, against the wishes of family, friends, and fiancée, to see the situation for himself.
My family, my close friends and my fiancée told me not to go to Basra, saying, “We don’t want to hear about your death from a media report.” They begged me to give up the idea.
Mr. Karim found that spirits in Basra were as high as in the days following Saddam Hussein's overthrow.
People feel new freedoms and compare it to the fall of the regime in 2003 when the coalition forces kicked Saddam out of power. Now they can speak freely, they can go to the market at night. Especially women, who were staying home to avoid being killed or kidnapped.
No government cars with tinted windows drive in the street like before, when most assassinations were carried out by officials in uniform. An Iraq soldier assured me that all cars used by criminals have been seized and they are not free any more to use them.
Night life in Basra is totally different from the old days. Fear is gone because of the number of security checkpoints in the street, restaurant and shops are open by night.
...
I talked to a restaurant owner who reopened recently. He was very happy to tell us about how good his business is now.
I asked him for a soft drink. He laughed and said, “You should take beer.” I said, “Do you have beer in the shop?”
He smiled and said, “Soon we will drink beer, maybe in two weeks.”
People have great hope that things will change
When I asked someone how he felt about the operation Charge of the Knights he said it was like being reborn.
It has been a startling turn for the better for al Maliki, who had been widely criticized for attempting to take on Moqtada al Sadr even though al Sadr is out of town -- presumably in Iran somewhere. But after engaging the Mahdi Army in Basra, al Maliki went after them in Sadr City. Last Friday al Sadr's Mahdi Army, for all intents and purposes, surrendered.
BAGHDAD — Followers of rebel cleric Muqtada al Sadr agreed late Friday to allow Iraqi security forces to enter all of Baghdad's Sadr City and to arrest anyone found with heavy weapons in a surprising capitulation that seemed likely to be hailed as a major victory for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki.
In return, Sadr's Mahdi Army supporters won the Iraqi government's agreement not to arrest Mahdi Army members without warrants, unless they were in possession of "medium and heavy weaponry."
The mere attempt to crack down on the Shiite militias has won him crucial support from Sunni political blocks, who recently rejoined the Iraqi government after boycotting it for nearly a year. That and the successes in Basra and Sadr City have emboldened the Prime Minister to continue efforts to wrest control of Iraq's cities from terrorists of all stripe. Nouri al Maliki is now in Mosul, al Qaeda's last bastion in Iraq, to supervise the Iraqi Army assault on al Qaeda.
BAGHDAD (AP) — Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki visited the northern city of Mosul on Wednesday to supervise a military offensive against al-Qaida in Iraq in its last major stronghold, regional Gov. Duraid Kashmola said.
Maliki's flight to northern Iraq mirrors a similar trip he took almost two months ago to the southern city of Basra, where government troops fought radical Shiite militias. That fighting spread to the Shiite slum of Sadr City in Baghdad, where a cease-fire to end those clashes was only reached on Monday.
The offensive, called Lion's Roar, is the latest effort by Iraqi and U.S. troops to clear al-Qaida fighters from Mosul, the nation's third largest city. Troops began sweeping though the city's neighborhoods last week.
This has apparently not been entirely unanticipated in Mosul. In hindsight, this somewhat mysterious post by the Iraqi bloggress A Star from Mosul offerered hints that something was up.
For the last two weeks we've been receiving lots of visitors, some come in the morning when I'm in college and some come in the afternoon. Mom can't do all the work herself since she has to sit with the visitors and so one of us (me and HNK) has to be there to help, and sometimes the two of us. From 4:30 till 7 and sometimes 8 PM the house is never empty of guests. I come back from college at around 3, take a nap and wakeup to get dressed again and help. When it's all over I just can't study.. I try but can't manage more than an hour of reading.
...
On Friday night they announced a curfew until further notice. I finally had time to study.
Al Maliki also has the support of Iraqi Kurds in his crackdown on al Qaeda in Mosul.
The KRG gives full approval to the massive manhunt for al-Qaeda elements in Mosul province, the last stronghold of the terrorist group in Iraq.
The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) officially announced its support for the military operation in Mosul to crack down on Al-Qaeda members, but asserted that Peshmarga forces would not take part.
The commander of military operations in Mosul province, Gen. Riyadh Jalal Tawfiq, announced the start of the operation, codenamed "Lion's Roar in Rightful Assault," last Saturday. It came after the arrival of a large number of military reinforcements from Baghdad. Execution of the operation, originally announced earlier this year, was delayed because of instability in Baghdad and in the southern part of the country.
"We, the KRG, support any plan or attempt by the central government and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki aimed at the stabilization of security and enhancement of the sovereignty of the State," said KRG's spokesman Jamal Abdullah in an interview with Radio Sawa. "The Peshmarga forces have not taken part in this operation because there was no official demand from the central government to the KRG."
I believe we are well past the tipping point in Iraq. The beginning of the end for al Qaeda in Iraq came with the Anbar Awakening which blossomed into all out war on al Qaeda during the surge and the Baghdad beltway operations. Those were great victories but they were largely U.S. victories that relied on Iraqi support, which was often in the form of intelligence. The crackdown against the Shiite militias was an Iraqi initiative. The lion's share of the fighting done be the Iraqi Army with U.S. air support.
Because this has come about at Nouri al Maliki's initiative, I believe that Iraq and the Iraqi democracy will hold, even if a Democrat wins the White House and makes good on campaign promises to pull U.S. troops back from the battle. It would appear that Nouri al Maliki will carry the day.
Paul And His Supporters Still Eye Coup
I warned you about this a few days ago. Ron Paul and his supporters are planning to disrupt the GOP conventions at the State and national level and take advantage of voter apathy who think that now that their votes have been cast, the nomination process is over. It’s not and the paulbots know it.
They will settle for a bigger seat at the table when it comes to the platform, but their real goal is to see if they can get enough delegates in place to prevent the nomination from going to John McCain.
Virtually all the nation’s political attention in recent weeks has focused on the compelling state-by-state presidential nomination struggle between two Democrats and the potential for party-splitting strife over there.
But in the meantime, quietly, largely under the radar of most people, the forces of Rep. Ron Paul have been organizing across the country to stage an embarrassing public revolt against Sen. John McCain when Republicans gather for their national convention in St. Paul at the beginning of September.
Paul’s presidential candidacy has been correctly dismissed all along in terms of winning the nomination. He was even excluded as irrelevant by Fox News from a nationally-televised GOP debate in New Hampshire.
But what’s been largely overlooked is Paul’s candidacy as a reflection of a powerful lingering dissatisfaction with the Arizona senator among the party’s most conservative conservatives. As anticipated a month ago in The Ticket, that situation could be exacerbated by today’s expected announcement from former Republican Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia for the Libertarian Party’s presidential nod, a slot held by Paul in 1988.
…
The last three months Paul’s forces, who donated $34.5 million to his White House effort and upwards of one million total votes, have, as The Ticket has noted, been fighting a series of guerrilla battles with party establishment officials at county and state conventions from Washington and Missouri to Maine and Mississippi. Their goal: to take control of local committees, boost their delegate totals and influence platform debates.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; McCain is a terrible candidate who has a track record of trashing the Constitution when it suits him as well as pandering to groups when he seeks power. But Ron Paul? Give me a break! He is a faux conservative/libertarian who on one had requests unconstitutional spending while on the other votes against it. No true conservative/libertarian would even let unconstitutional spending come to a vote.
Couple this with his non-libertarian views on liberty being an unalienable right and that as long as he’s got his screw everyone else and you have a man and a group of followers who are just as bad as John McCain and not exactly people you want having much of a say in the platform building process.
Make no mistake, the supporters of Ron Paul really believe that their candidate is the Barack Obama of the GOP and swoon when he speaks – ignoring his failings of course. And if they can they want to overturn the nomination and put his name on the ticket. They won’t but they will try.
And if the apathetic voters let them they might just do even more damage to the Republican Party. Which, on second thought might not be a bad idea. But I certainly don’t want them in charge of platform writing and policy making any more than McCain’s supporters.
Staying in the race
I've speculated that Hillary's determination to stay in the Democratic presidential primary race is partly motivated by revenge. The once "inevitable candidate" has been abandoned by most of the Democratic party leadership who now urge he to step aside for the good of the party, but Hillary is not quitting. Today the Wall Street Journal suggests there may be other purposes.
Hillary Clinton's chances of winning the Democratic nomination are increasingly remote, with even a blow-out victory in Tuesday's West Virginia primary unlikely to make much difference. Still, the New York senator has vowed to continue campaigning until the nominating process ends June 3 in Montana, South Dakota and Puerto Rico.
Political analysts say office seekers who hang on, even long after the race seems futile, may be hoping to position themselves for a later run or to reshape the party more to their liking. They may be bargaining for the vice presidency, feel pressure from supporters or believe there is an off-chance they will get lucky.
It might not turn out to be such a bad thing if Hillary can reshape the Democratic party more to her liking. The party is so far left of the American public that just about any impact she has on it will be an improvement. ( My emphasis above.)
Book Review: Faith, Reason and the War Against Jihadism




It’s short, but the book Faith, Reason and the War Against Jihadism strikes a lot of important chords. Some people don’t want to admit that there are those out there that hate other people because of their religious beliefs and that that hatred culminates in a convert or die mentality. But whether or not people want to admit it or not doesn’t detract from it as the truth.
Western Judeo-Christian nations were warned about aspects of the Muslim faith many years ago when the Barbary Pirates were raiding western ships and enslaving their crews. Tripoli’s ambassador, Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja said of his war against non-Muslim nations, “… that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” But even so, modern day apologists for those Muslims that abide by Jihadism still make excuses ranging from it is somehow the West’s fault that they hate us to they are simply being misunderstood when they speak.
George Weigel’s book provides a nice, short read to help understand that these extremists do not attack us because they are impoverished (or what ever excuse you make) but rather, simply because they believe they have a divine right to do so.
What I liked:
The book is short containing 15 Lessons. Some of the best are:
Lesson 4 in which the author approaches an often taboo subject about how the Islamic world was actually aggressors and that they became bitter after the Western world struck back and enslaved them as they had tried to do.
Lesson 6 in which Weigel notes that it is not “Islamophobic” to look at the links between jihadism and terrorism. He also discusses the Pope’s widely criticized speech in September 06 where he discussed how those that abide by Jihad have a mistaken understanding of God.
Lesson 8 where he dares, much to the chagrin of liberals no doubt, accurately discuss how the hand of the West was forced after September 11, 2001 and how moving to remove the cancer that had been growing in the Middle East was a “realistic objective, given an unacceptable status quo …”
He also takes on the “Unhinged Left” (radical liberals who blame George Bush for everything) and the “Unhinged Right” (radical libertarian who aren’t very libertarian who also blame George Bush for everything).
What I didn’t like:
Really, not much. This book is pretty straight forward. If anything its shortness will be one of its detractions. While it is a quick read, it glosses over a lot of important points that could be further developed to help bolster its main points.
For the more than just the casual observer of events, such espousals and expansions are unnecessary. But for many who still have their heads in the sand to this day they and who do not know much of the background and history, they may be left with a short sighted reaction that this book has little of substance.
Sure he stumbles at points such as his apparant discussion of illegal immigration as not all that important but no book is perfect.
Overall however definitely a must read.
Who won what?
Hezbollah is claiming victory in its battle against the democratic government of Lebanon. According to the Washington Times Hezbollah is redrawing the the Mideast map.
RAMALLAH, West Bank — Hezbollah's dramatic gains in Lebanon last week are just part of a regional process that began last year in the Gaza Strip and will continue in Jordan and Egypt, a Hamas official in the West Bank told The Washington Times.
Sheik Yazeeb Khader, a Ramallah-based Hamas political activist and editor, said militant groups across the Middle East are gaining power at the expense of U.S.-backed regimes, just as Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip from forces loyal to U.S.-backed Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.
"What happened in Gaza in 2007 is an achievement; now it is happening in 2008 in Lebanon. It's going to happen in 2009 in Jordan and it's going to happen in 2010 in Egypt," Sheik Khader said in an interview.
"We are seeing a redrawing of the map of the Middle East where the forces of resistance and steadfastness are the ones moving the things on the ground."
Not everyone agrees with that assessment.
Sami Abu Zuhri, a spokesman for the Hamas government in Gaza, took a different approach to the standoff in Lebanon by saying that the fighting primarily served Israel.
Meanwhile, the Jerusalem Post reports that it was the Lebanese Army who took control after a cease fire went into effect Sunday.
Lebanon's army deployed across mountains overlooking the capital Monday after at least 11 people were killed in fierce clashes between pro- and anti-government supporters entrenched in the hilly plateau, security officials and paramedics said.
The fighting lulled late Sunday after pro-government Druse leader Walid Jumblatt called on his Druse opponents in the mountains, who are allied with Hizbullah, to mediate a cease-fire and hand over the region to Lebanese troops.
The Post article contains this insight into the ramifications of Israel's struggles against Hezbollah and their like.
After the civil war ended in 1990, all of Lebanon's various militias surrendered their weapons and transformed into political parties, keeping only small arms. Only Hizbullah was allowed to keep its arms because it was considered a resistance movement battling Israel.
The destruction of Israel has long been the stated aim of terrorist groups that call themselves resistance movements, but who are in reality armed thugs engaged in the business of terror for hire to clients like Syria and Iran.
We Get Email … We Get Email … We Get Lots And Lots Of …
Yes, it’s true. We actually do get a rather sizable amount of email every day. So I thought I would delve into the old cyber mailbag and answer a few:
Trisha writes:
You call yourself a “libertarian conservative” what the heck is that?
Trisha,
A libertarian (true libertarian mind you) is a conservative (a true conservative mind you) and visa versa. We believe in liberty and the unalienable rights of all mankind which include life, liberty, pursuing happiness and property.
A lot of libertarians don’t like to be considered “conservative” – these are libertarians that really aren’t libertarian at all (i.e. those that believe that it is actually ok to murder living babies just because they are in the womb or who think that since they have their liberty they are under no obligation to promote it for others). I do not mind it. Lots of people call me a “conservative” even though I a lot more call me “libertarian”. I use the term “libertarian conservative” to make it clear that they are one and the same.
Pamela writes:
You often talk about how Social Security is unconstitutional could you explain what you mean?
Read the Constitution. Read the Federalist Papers for a definition of what Article I says about limited powers. Then tell me if you see anything in there about social welfare spending on programs like Social Security.
Caesar writes:
Have you made any decision yet on who you will support for President in November?
Not Hillary. Not Obama. Not McCain. Not Paul. Not the communist party, the socialist party or the green party. Other than that, I haven’t decided.
Rick writes:
Do you get a lot of hits from government sites?
Absolutely. Every day we get a ton of lookers from places like house.gov. Hi guys! We’re watching you watching us.
Douglas writes:
What can we do to save America from moving even further leftward?
Well, we could always just kick California, Washington and New York out of the union.
Gertrude writes:
If Hillary (or Obama) and McCain were tied in votes and you had the chance to cast the tie breaker to save us and put McCain in the White House would you?
Well, since the popular vote doesn’t decided the election this is preposterous. But let’s assume this were the case. No. I would not vote for McCain. If our country is in such bad shape that Hillary or Obama would get that many votes, my one vote wouldn’t “save us” in the long run.
I’ll just get in the hand basket and enjoy the last bit of the ride.
Jon writes:
Have you ever thought about writing a book?
Yes. Actually I have three in the works but I have ADD so they never seem to get … oooh look … something more interesting!
Whither the economy
For a hint on which way the U.S. economy is likely to head in the event that Barack Obama wins the White House in November, we would do well to look at the state of Mississippi. Over the past 30 years, Mississippi has been one of the poorest states in the union, while at the same time being "America's No. 1 judicial hell hole for jackpot jury verdicts," according to Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour.
One of the worst places, in term of frivolous lawsuits, was Jefferson County. It became renowned as the lawsuit capital of the country, with more plaintiffs than residents. This is the infamous county where one pharmacist was named in more than 1,000 lawsuits. In one legendary case against a pharmaceutical company that sold the diet pill Pondimin (part of the weight-loss combination known as fen-phen, which was later banned), a Jefferson County jury awarded $1 billion to the family of a woman who had taken the drug.
But four years ago, Mississippi transformed itself from judicial hell hole to job magnet, a story that is instructive for other states trying to attract jobs in turbulent economic times. The lessons here are especially timely, because the pro-growth tort reform trend that was once spreading across the country may soon reverse course.
Mississippi's tort reform dealt a blow to litigation business in that state, but that precipitated a stunning turn around for rest of the economy.
Almost overnight, the flow of lawsuits began to dry up and businesses started to trickle in. Federal Express invested $1 billion in a new facility in the state. Toyota chose Mississippi over about a dozen other states for a new $1.2 billion, 2,000-worker auto plant. The auto maker has stipulated that the company would pull up stakes if the tort reforms were overturned by the legislature or activist judges.
That hasn't happened. About 60,000 new jobs have arrived in four years – not a small number in a workforce of about 1.3 million – and a sharp improvement from the 30,000 jobs lost in the four years before Mr. Barbour took office. Since the law took effect, the number of medical malpractice lawsuits has fallen by nearly 90%, which in turn has cut malpractice insurance costs by 30% to 45%, depending on the county.
Unfortunately, Mississippi's gain is unlikely to be matched in many other states around the country, as trial lawyers are ramping up their political spending in a battle to make sure Mississippi style tort reform doesn't spread.
Meanwhile, in other states, the trial bar is spending record amounts on 2008 campaigns to make sure that the political massacre plaintiff lawyers suffered in Mississippi isn't repeated. Next to the unions, trial lawyers are the biggest givers to Democrats. It is no secret they will want a payback if the Democrats have a big year on the state level. A big Democratic theme this year, starting with Barack Obama at the top of the ticket, is to roll back the well-heeled special interests. Trial lawyers – some of the richest people in the country – apparently don't count.
The trial lawyers perform a societal function dear to Democratic hearts -- wealth redistribution. But, by taking from the rich to give to the injured, trial lawyers redistribute huge chunks of that wealth to themselves, and more importantly to Democrats, to Democratic party coffers. Democrats and trial lawyers will look to keep that gravy train on its tracks and a President Barack Obama will undoubtedly help. Based on Mississippi's recent history, we can expect this will take its toll on economic growth in the country as a whole.
RSS









