Scrubbing Trayvon Martin (Updated with Guest Commentary)
Gene Lalor | June 29, 2013
Unless the “star witness,” 19 year old high schooler Rachel Jeantel, had an unlikely attack of discretion and decided to scrub-a-dub-dub all those tweets herself. But, more about that scrub-a-dubbing later.
Sanford Neighborhood Watch Commander Zimmerman stands accused of killing 17 year old Trayvon Martin on the rainy evening of February 26, 2012 and Trayvon’s good friend and close confidante, testified on Wednesday and Thursday as to her recollections of the last cellphone conversation she had with Martin as he was being pursued by Zimmerman.
Aside from Ms. Jeantel’s much ridiculed, muddled tone, her evasive, obviously annoyed responses to both prosecutors’ and defense attorneys’ questioning, her dim memory of those last moments of a dear friend’s life while she was admittedly “doing” her hair, if she was in any way being presented as a character witness for Trayvon Martin, she failed miserably.
Morons are not usually the best character witnesses, but the Haitian-born Rachel Jeantel doesn’t seem to be a moron; she might simply be misunderstood and, ok, more than a tad dumb.
According to fellow black, Christina Coleman writing on GlobalGrind.com, white people just don’t understand her because “She’s hard. She’s black. And your assumptions about her background and lack of education make you feel like you are better, somehow. That her testimony, no matter how powerful and impactful it may be to this is implausible. . . But maybe the reason white people don’t understand Rachel Jeantel has something more to do with white privilege then, what they would call, Rachel’s capricious nature. Let’s for one second try to understand why Rachel is “angry” (read emotional), “hood” (read blunt), and “unintelligent” (read multilingual)”.
I, for one, not only fail to understand Rachel; I fail to understand Christina, although I do understannd that she is a raving black racist attempting to defend a nincompoop teenager whose brain was so muddled by booze and drugs and sex–if we can believe her scrubbed tweets–by using the tired-out, old charge of white racism, that last resort always trotted out when reason and common sense fail.
Rachel Samara struck up the same white racist theme on Global Grind writing, “A predominantly white jury is not going to like Rachel Jeantel” a girl “who has no media training and who is fully entrenched in a hostile environment,” (hostile because there are no blacks on the all-female jury), as did Mary Elizabeth Williams on the far leftist Salon.com who opined that Jeantel ”is not thin or blond or demure. So there goes her credibility,” as if her rudeness, defensiveness, offensive language, and overall pissed-off demeanor were irrelevant.
As for Jeantel’s–or Twitter’s–scrub-a-dubs, SmokingGun.com has posted pages of them at http://tinyurl.com/phgnqod. The night before her first court appearance, the poor, misunderstood Ms. Jeantel–or Twitter–delet,ed various sexually explicit Rachel photos, tweets relating to her underage drinking, her illicit use of drugs, her drunk driving, and dozens of others that someone apparently felt would reflect negatively on the prosecution’s “star witness.”
From the get-go, this entire case has been a farce, less a criminal prosecution than an effort to satiate bloodthirsty elements of the black commuinity, mainly the New Black Panther Party which illegally and with legal impunity posted “WANTED–DEAD OR ALIVE” pictures of George Zimmerman shortly after the 2012 tragedy, and to keep Trayvon’s family in the running for some monetary gain as a a result of their son’s death.
Crime File News’ Paul Huebl believes the case against Zimmerman should never have been filed at all and that when the trial collapses and Zimmerman is acquitted, “I fully expect organized race rioting,” nationwide. If Huebl is correct, which he probably is, maybe we should hope for Zimmerman’s conviction despite all the evidence to the contrary. A conviction would help preserve the peace and keep Rachel Jeantel and the New Black Panthers happy and would absolutely delight Barack Hussein Obama since the son he never had would fincoally be vindicated.
(UPDATE: A WashingtonPost.com reader offered some perspective on the Zimmerman-Martin story: “In its last complete National Criminal Victimization Survey (1994), the Justice Department revealed blacks to have committed 1,600,951 violent crimes against whites. Only 15 percent of these had robbery as a motive. We can safely infer that most of the rest had race as at least a partial motive. Eighty-five percent of the attacks were assaults and rapes. While blacks were committing these 1.6 million crimes against whites, whites were reciprocating with 165,345 violent offenses against blacks. Blacks, representing thirteen percent of the nation, committed more than 90 percent of the violent interracial crime. Fifty-seven percent of the violent crime committed by blacks had white victims. Less than 3 percent of violence committed by whites had black victims. In 1994, a black was 64 times more likely to attack a white than vice versa.”)
Question: If true, why have almost 20 years elapsed without an update?
Contributor's website: http://www.genelalor.com/
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.