Dr. Ben Carson v Rep. Jan Schakowsky, God v the Godless
Gene Lalor | February 11, 2013
The Democrat Party lost its wayÂ some 40 orÂ 50 years ago when it beganÂ its evolutionÂ from a loyal, God-fearing,Â legitimate politicalÂ institution into a disloyal, God-hating, divisive, racist, politically-correct group of angry socialists intent on destroying the national fabric that binds America together.
A classic example: the Democrat reaction to Benjamin Carson.
Â Dr. Benjamin Carson’s outstanding, non-partisan address to the National Prayer Breakfast on February 7thÂ should have beenÂ a seminal moment for President Barack Hussein Obama who was seated on the stage in Washington, D.C. while Dr. Carson brilliantly dismantled both theÂ principles and practices of Obamacare, exposed the idiocy of Obama’s economic policies, and demonstrated the fallacies of political correctness.
The president surely must have finally realized that his legacy program and tax policies not only had serious and articulate opponentsÂ butÂ that his ideas areÂ fundamentally flawed.
And, maybe not.
Â Three days later Obama’s storm trooper in the person of leftist Democrat Rep. Jan Schakowsky, apparently shocked by Dr. Carson’s honesty and certainly disturbed by the validity of his views, dutifully rode to Obama’s defense by attacking, not theÂ acclaimed physician’s honesty or theoriesÂ but his audacity in referencing God, Jesus Christ, andÂ biblical citations to support his opinions.
The pro-abortionist wife of an ex-convict told Candy Crowley on CNN, “I think itâ€™s really–not really an appropriate place to make this kind of political speech, and to invoke God as support for that kind of view”–at a prayer breakfast.
Schawkowsky then took the opportunity toÂ score some political points of her own by attempting to explain, in aÂ semi-coherent palaver and without citing any specific points mentioned by Dr. Carson, “I think of most of all the kind of message that he was giving shows a real empathy gap with where the American people are right now, and I think itâ€™s reflective of where many of the Republicans and Tea Parties are right now, that we need to have an economy that works for everyone.”
What “kind of message”?Â Â The messageÂ that the indigentÂ must beÂ providedÂ for?Â Does thatÂ represent Schakowsky’s “empathy gap”?Â Was she saying that Republicans and Tea Partiers don’t want “an economy that works for everyone”?Â What do they want,Â the moribund economy we have now?Â Â Precisely whatÂ was she saying about a speech at a prayer breakfast aside from ripping Dr. Carson’s unseemly invocation of religion?
See and hearÂ the doctor’sÂ address here http://tinyurl.com/dyao3lj and the representative’s ramblings here http://tinyurl.com/a2k7zfj.Â Judge for yourself who is most representative of mainstream America.
Contributor's website: http://www.genelalor.com/
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.