Election 2012: Polls and Lies
Gene Lalor | October 10, 2012
ï¿½ (Picture compliments of IOwntheWorld,com)
When whiny, old Dave Obamalackey Letterman makes snarky jokes about the president after months of mocking Romney, you can smell a change in the election air.
With four weeks to go before Barack Hussein Obama and his henchmen dispatch their Black Panther storm troopers to intimidate white voters again and try to steal the election after years ofï¿½deceiving his supporters and months of misrepresentingï¿½Mitt Romney, it’s obvious the political worm is gradually turning.ï¿½
Besides Letterman, there are a number of other indicators suggestingï¿½Obama and his ilkï¿½willï¿½lose big time on November 6th and be denied the opportunity to subvert our country further and once more fool a plurality into casting their ballots for an egomaniacal, radicalï¿½socialist.
In view of the continuing, sorry state of the economy, the undermining of our national integrityï¿½following revelations that the administration sacrificed the lives of four Americans in Benghazi on the altars of Islamic appeasement and political correctness, the utter failure of Obama’s approach to the Arab Spring, the gender, racial, and class divisiveness he has created, the only explanation for Obama’sï¿½re-nomination is that the Democrat Party has lost its collective mind, probably as a consequence of its loss of interest in America’s future.ï¿½
ï¿½ Perhaps disturbed by a UCLA study that found liberal women are more manly-looking than conservative women or, more likely, the result of finally understanding that Obama’s pro-abortion andï¿½anti-American policiesï¿½represent the true war on women, America’s female voters have switched in droves toward Romney.ï¿½ï¿½
Aï¿½Pew poll reveals that “Last month, women preferred Obama by an astounding 18 points.ï¿½ Now, they are equally split between both candidates at 47 percent apiece.”ï¿½
Those results complement another “astounding” finding by Pew that “among Independents, Romney won by an astounding 78-14 margin,” andï¿½”a 12-point swing [to Romney] among likely voters.ï¿½ In Pew’s last poll, conducted in the middle of September, Obama led Romney 51-43 among likely voters.ï¿½ Now, Romney leads 49-45.” (http://tinyurl.com/97cygqe)
ï¿½ Presidents and political parties and theirï¿½surrogates tend to suck up to constituents they think they can easily deceive and from whom they can seek financial support toï¿½finance their campaigns.ï¿½ï¿½
However,ï¿½no president or candidate or party has ever sunk to the depths of electoral depravity the Obamians have reached: engaging inï¿½what is easily the mostï¿½disgraceful–and illegal–machinationsï¿½to circumvent election law in American history.ï¿½
They have, allegedly, been soliciting and acceptingï¿½contributions from people and nationsï¿½committed to destroying us.ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½
ï¿½ï¿½ Newsweek, not exactly a conservative bastion, yesterday reported that “In September the Obama campaign brought in its biggest fundraising haulï¿½$181 million. Nearly all of that amount (98 percent) came from small donations, through 1.8 million transactions.ï¿½
“The Obama campaign says that it is rigorous in its self-regulation effort. ‘We take great care to make sure that every one of our more than three million donors are eligible to donate and that our fundraising efforts fully comply with all U.S. laws and regulations,’ thatï¿½employ ‘multiple security tools to screen all online credit-card contributions’ and that ‘Potentially improper donations, such as those originating from foreign Internet addresses, are returned to any donors who cannot provide a copy of their current U.S. passport photo pages.’ “ï¿½
A major problem with that baloney is that it’s just another Obama crock, according toï¿½the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) whichï¿½keeps track ofï¿½online donations to congressional and presidential candidates.ï¿½
Know that CVV or Card Verification Value code found on the backs of your credit cards?ï¿½ It’s intended to insure youï¿½and the card aren’t fraudulent when you make an online transaction of any sort, including when you make aï¿½contribution to a political entity.ï¿½ï¿½
The GAI discovered that 47.3% of all House and Senate donation websites don’t require donors to enter their CVV, exposing those sites to illegal “foreign and fraudulent contributions.”
Romneyï¿½s website requires the CVV, Obamaï¿½s doesn’t and Obama.com is owned by businessman-Obama fundraiser Robert Roche who resides in Shanghai.ï¿½ Heï¿½also happens to ownï¿½a companyï¿½with ties to the Communist Chinese government.ï¿½
Coincidentally, the GAI found that 68% of the traffic going to Obama.com originates from foreign locations.
Without mentioning Roche, Obama.com’s clearly unethical–and illegal–trick of not mandating donors enterï¿½a CVV codeï¿½without mentioningï¿½ that 68% ofï¿½Obama.com’s trafficï¿½probably came from foreigners, the Obama campaign resorted to a non-sequitur by saying the GAI’s president Peter Schweizer was nothing more than a Sarah Palin ï¿½right-wing activist.ï¿½ï¿½ (http://tinyurl.com/93q3qnr)ï¿½ï¿½
Anyone else wondering ifï¿½China’s Hu Jintao or Russia’s Vladimir Putin or Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad orï¿½Hugo Chavez or any other America-hating demagogue might have contributed to the campaign of the guy who might benefit them?
We may never know.
The American electorate is well-accustomed to the lies and dirty politicsï¿½conducted by this misbegotten president who learnedï¿½most ofï¿½his nastyï¿½tricks and subterfuges on the dirty streets of Chicagoï¿½butï¿½may beï¿½ill-prepared for the extremities to which the Obama Gang will go.ï¿½ï¿½
America should know for certain whether the electorate is as dumb as the Obamians think they are by November 7th.ï¿½
Contributor's website: http://www.genelalor.com/
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.