“2016: Obama’s America”–Rated: NRC
Gene Lalor | September 11, 2012
Â The Motion Picture Association of AmericaÂ assignedÂ a PG rating to the Dinesh D’Souza-Gerald R. Molen political documentary “2016: Obama’s America”Â due toÂ ”thematic elements, brief language and smoking images”.Â Â
AfterÂ seeing the film,Â I can unequivocably say the MPAA missed the ratingsÂ boat.Â “2016″ deserves an entirely new classification: “NRC–Not Recommended for Conservatives” due to redundancy andÂ disturbing reality.
The film is redundant inÂ that mostÂ conservatives haveÂ long been aware that the election of Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 was theÂ unfortunate,Â intended consequenceÂ of a meticulously-orchestrated joint Democrat Party/MSM scam designed toÂ install an extremeÂ leftistÂ in the most powerful office on EarthÂ by concealing theÂ truth about his heritage, his family, his associations, and his education.Â
Â For my part, the only exception to the old news quality of 2016 wasÂ the inclusionÂ ofÂ an interview of Obama’sÂ impoverished half-brother George Obama who still lives in a miniscule shack outside Nairobi, Kenya.Â Â Millionaire BarackÂ shamelessly preaches that we are indeed our brothers’ keepersÂ and lives in mansionÂ yetÂ hasn’t offered to do a damned thing to help out poor George.Â
You see, Barack’sÂ Kenyan, half-sibling fundamentally disagrees withÂ hisÂ rich, half-blackÂ American president on certain issues and for that reason can rot in his Kenyan hut-hell.Â Â Â Â
“2016″ is also not recommended for conservatives because, although most knew some of the hidden and damningÂ details concerning Obama’s background and beliefs, to have thoseÂ disturbing factsÂ concentrated in 89 minutes on the silver screen can literally be overwhelming. Â I heard and saw a number of audience membersÂ weeping during and after the screening.Â
As one exiting, cryingÂ moviegoer, no doubt a member of that dastardly tea party, observed to my wife, “That bastardÂ has to go!”Â I just hope she wasn’t referring to me!Â Â
The audienceÂ were not shaken as much by the film’s contentÂ as by the suggestions of what America will be like a mere four years down the road should Obama be re-elected.Â To all but his most ardentÂ admirersÂ who still fondly regard him as the nation’s savior,Â Obama’s America in 2016 is not a pretty picture.Â
Predictably panned by the same mainstream media that elected Obama,Â ”2016″ has been characterized as “strident” (New York Times), “an infomercial” (Washington Post), and generally not worth the price of admission by the rest of Obama’s MSM.Â
Stridency (really meaningÂ uncomfortablyÂ honest in MSM-speak)Â or infomercialityÂ (actually denoting an uncomfortable excess of factual evidence in MSM-estimation) are complimentary and audiences have been effectively putting the lie to the mainstreamers’ claimÂ that “2016″ isn’tÂ worth the exorbitant cost ofÂ enteringÂ a movie theater to see it.
As of September 9th, two months after its release inÂ one, lone moviehouse, the film has grossed $26.2 million.Â More significantly, “2016: Obama’s America” has surpassedÂ most of Michael Mooreâ€™sÂ shlockumentaries and hasÂ earned more than Al Gore’sÂ highly-hyped, low-truth “An Inconvenient Truth.”Â (http://tinyurl.com/9gl2m7c)Â Â
What does all of the above mean for the United States of America in 2012?Â
It meansÂ ”2016:Â Obama’s America” should be seen by every American who voted for Barack Hussein ObamaÂ four years agoÂ out of ignorance and who is contemplating voting for him again despite incontrovertible evidence heÂ is a dangerous fraud as well as an incompetent president whoÂ has severely damaged our country with his leftist ideology-driven policies.Â
Perhaps the worst truth exposed in “2016″ is that the MSM knew the truth about Obama 1n 2008 and knows it in 2012 and refuses to divulge it.Â Â Â
It means “2016: Obama’s America” shouldÂ be avoided by the faint of heart who understand all of the above but who tend to get nauseousÂ when they contemplate four more years in Obamaland.Â
It means that our children and grandkids should be looking into alternatives for the future in that eventuality.Â
Contributor's website: http://www.genelalor.com/
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.