RSSQuick Thought For Today (December 30, 2010)
J.J. Jackson | December 30, 2010
Far too many scoff at the thought of State’s right to nullify extraconstitutional acts by our federal government. This scoffing has indeed grown loud over the centuries because as time rolls on we see more and more unconstitutional acts passed. And that if those who have scoffed before agree that nullification may finally be done in the current or the next instance it would set precedence to undo all such instances before them too.
For those of you that scoff at nullification, answer me this. If our federal Congress passes unto the States unconstitutional laws and those laws shall not be vetoed by the President or overturned by the Courts then what? If all branches of the federal government choose to act in concern against limited government then what if not nullification?
How do you propose that the States enforce their rights under the tenth amendment if not through nullification? Or do you bluntly propose that they do not enforce such things and instead insist upon their people being simply raped of their liberties by the federal hand?
Copyright © 2006-2010
J.J. Jackson is a libertarian conservative author from Pittsburgh, PA who has been writing and promoting individual liberty since 1993 and is President of Land of the Free Studios, Inc. He is the Pittsburgh Conservative Examiner for Examiner.com. He is also the owner of The Right Things - Conservative T-shirts & Gifts. His weekly commentary along with exclusives not available anywhere else can be found at LibertyReborn.com (Digital Fingerprint: libertyreborn123456789)
Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.
Leave a Reply
Loading ...Recommended Reading:
