Hope&Change-enhagen

Cao | December 4, 2009

Yes, Al Bore cancelled his Hope&Change-enhagen speech¹ where his plan to charge starry-eyed believers in his ManBearPig religion $1200 a piece for the privilege of shaking his hand, breathing in his CO2 and having his latest book inflicted on them² was abandoned. As a result of his cowardly exit-his ‘evil henchmen’ are left to prop and defend the falling house of cards-and OMG- Sarah Palin weighed in on Obama’s visit to the Danish Junk Science Festival on her facebook page!

The sky is really falling, but not the way they said it was.

The president’s decision to attend the international climate conference in Copenhagen needs to be reconsidered in light of the unfolding Climategate scandal. The leaked e-mails involved in Climategate expose the unscientific behavior of leading climate scientists who deliberately destroyed records to block information requests, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures, and conspired to silence the critics of man-made global warming. I support Senator James Inhofe’s call for a full investigation into this scandal. Because it involves many of the same personalities and entities behind the Copenhagen conference, Climategate calls into question many of the proposals being pushed there, including anything that would lead to a cap and tax plan.

Policy should be based on sound science, not snake oil. I took a stand against such snake oil science when I sued the federal government over its decision to list the polar bear as an endangered species despite the fact that the polar bear population has increased. I’ve never denied the reality of climate change; in fact, I was the first governor to create a subcabinet position to deal specifically with the issue. I saw the impact of changing weather patterns firsthand while serving as governor of our only Arctic state. But while we recognize the effects of changing water levels, erosion patterns, and glacial ice melt, we cannot primarily blame man’s activities for the earth’s cyclical weather changes. The drastic economic measures being pushed by dogmatic environmentalists won’t change the weather, but will dramatically change our economy for the worse.

Policy decisions require real science and real solutions, not junk science and doomsday scare tactics pushed by an environmental priesthood that capitalizes on the public’s worry and makes them feel that owning an SUV is a “sin” against the planet. In his inaugural address, President Obama declared his intention to “restore science to its rightful place.” Boycotting Copenhagen while this scandal is thoroughly investigated would send a strong message that the United States government will not be a party to fraudulent scientific practices. Saying no to Copenhagen and cap and tax are first steps in “restoring science to its rightful place.”

- Sarah Palin

To understand why Obama is not going to pay attention to what Climategate revealed, observe the following chart from a research report by J.P. Morgan.³ This is the reason why Obama has not announced a change in plan regarding the Copenhagen meeting.
They don’t care that the Climategate emails exposed junk science behind the global warming myth.

obamacabinet2

Just as the climate scientists behind the global warming scam had a vested interest in keeping the funding flowing to their research projects, so, too, does the Obama administration have a vested interest in keeping their ‘grow government by any means necessary’ power grab going.

If you expect any free market solutions to come out of the Obama administration, you are beating a dead horse; it just ain’t gonna happen; they are locked into public policy solutions from their lack of experience and interest in the private sector. Of course, this is intentional because socialism has everything to do with ridding a country of a private sector; therefore ridding its people of their freedom to choose.

Howard Dean revealed in a speech in Paris (video clip above)⁴ that the ‘debate between capitalism and socialism is over’ and details the democrats’ PERMANENT CAMPAIGN for electing democrats and for establishing policy- for an ultimately one-party state. But you can see where that comes from when you look again at that chart.