*_After reading much of the emails and source code,
assessment is as follows:

You see the fear mongering Alarmists can and are trying to minimize the intent of the emails,but they cannot do that with the source code and data manipulation.
That is cut and dried, hard wired in the results.
Just like a list of ingredients that bake a cake,
it truly is what it is, the sum of it’s parts.
It is out and out fraud in regards to the results.
This clearly delegitimizes any claims of global warming.
The more people, who are exposed, and familiarized to these hard facts,
the better the chance they might finally wake up
and shrug off their emotional investment in Global Warming, Climate Change, or any other such nonsense.
That emotional investment is the only hold the UN and cohorts have going for them.
This is the gift from those hackers which we need to be explained.

An easy explanation of what ClimateGate means, ClimateGate emails and computer programs were taken from a main server at the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia.
It is not known if this was a theft or the actions of a whistleblower, disgusted with what the lead scientists at CRU were doing.
ClimateGate exposed the cabal of 20 – 30 scientists (not just at CRU) that peer reviewed each others papers, strong-armed scientific journals to only print their views, and then sat on the IPCC panels as authors judging which published studies go into the IPCC final reports.
This is why they always keep shouting “peer reviewed studies, peer reviewed studies, peer reviewed studies”.
They owned the peer review process.
ClimateGate exposed that this small group has been adding positive corrections to the raw global temperature data, inflating the amount of published temperature rise over the last 50 years.
Both CRU in the UK and NASA-GISS in the US add these biases.
At CRU, the programmers did not even know what and why some corrections were added every month.
Only since satellite monitoring for comparison have the amounts of biasing leveled off.
ClimateGate exposed the leaders of this cabal instructing each other to delete emails, data files, and data analysis programs ahead of already filed Freedom Of Information Act requests for raw data and computer codes, clearly a crime. ClimateGate exposed the “trick” about the Hockey stick figure and other studies that performed proxy construction of past temperatures.

*** Definition Climate proxies
Climate proxies are devices that suggest the climate patterns of the past, even before those patterns were archived by humans.[1] To produce the most precise results, systematic cross-verification between proxy indicators is necessary for accuracy in readings and record-keeping.[2] The study of past climates is known as paleoclimatology.[3] Examples of proxies include ice cores, tree rings, boreholes, corals, and lake and ocean sediments.
*** End of Definition

After all, reconstruction of the last 1,000 years of climate is the first step in predicting the future with super computer programs as explained below: Everything about all 21 super computer programs used by the IPCC to determine future global warming rely on best-determined past sensitivities to solar and volcanic effects (climate forcings) from the proxy temperature record.
1. The elimination of the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age (the handle of the hockey stick) was necessary so that past solar effects could be minimized, thereby allowing almost all of the warming in the last 75 years to be blamed on Greenhouse Gasses. Raw data (like tree-ring thickness, radioisotope of mud layers in a lake bottom, ice core analyses, etc.) are used as a proxy for reconstruction of the temperature record for 1000 AD to 1960 AD. To ensure desired results, statistical manipulation of the raw data and selecting only supporting data, cherry-picking, was suspected and later proved.
2. The slope of long-term 10-year running average global temperature using thermometers from 1900 to present (the blade of the hockey stick) was maximized with the sloppy gridding code, Urban Heat Island effects, hiding the declines, and even fabricating data (documented in the leaked source code comments revealed with ClimateGate). This ensured that the Greenhouse Gas effect coefficient in all 21 of the super computers was maximized, and that maximizes the temperature result at year 2100 based on Greenhouse Gas increases. This thermometer data was used to replace the tree ring-divergence after 1960 and plot this over the climate history data of (1) above giving the false impression that the reconstructed 1000 AD to 1960 AD results are more accurate than they are.

*** Definition Backcasting
Backcasting starts with defining a desirable future and then works backwards to identify policies and programs that will connect the future to the present.
The fundamental question of backcasting asks: “if we want to attain a certain goal, what actions must be taken to get there?”
Forecasting is the process of predicting the future based on current trend analysis.
Backcasting approaches the challenge of discussing the future from the opposite direction.
*** End of Definition

3. Because tuning of the super computer programs uses back casting, the computer outputs could always replicate the 20th Century (by design); therefore it was assumed that the models had almost everything in them. Because of (1) and (2) above, nearly all climate change predicted by the models was due to CO2 and positive feedbacks and hardly any of the climate change was for other reasons like solar, understood or not.
4. Over the years, when better numbers for volcanic effects, black carbon, aerosols, land use, ocean and atmospheric multi-decadal cycles, etc. became available, it appears that CRU made revisions to refit the back cast, but could hardly understand what the code was doing due to previous correction factor fudging and outright fabricating, as documented in the released code as part of ClimateGate.
5. After the IPCC averages the 21 super computer outputs of future projected warming (anywhere from 2-degrees to 7-degrees, not very precise), that output is used to predict all manner of catastrophes. (Fires, floods, droughts, blizzards, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, insects, extinctions, diseases, civil wars, cats & dogs sleeping together, etc.)
So shut-up or be called a denier, live the way we tell you to live, pay more for everything, and just send money for my research on the effects of global climate change on horseshoe crabs (which have been around for about 440 million years through all possible temperature ranges).

I hope that this makes the ClimateGate controversy easier to understand.

Sincerely Yours;
Northpal Communications

P.S.

Al Gore (former Vice President of the USA) and David Blood (former CEO of Goldman Sachs Asset Management Company) carbon trading company is known as “Blood & Gore”