Is the President Too Good for ObamaCare?

John Lillipop | November 30, 2009 

By John W. Lillpop

President Obama has made it clear that enactment of health care reform is a make or break proposition for his presidency. He has even indicated that his passion for universal health care is so strong that he might forego ambitions for reelection rather than back down.

He and other liberal politicians have tried to frame the issue as a moral one, a battle in which Democrats have been righteously engaged for decades, only to be stymied by big business and Republican interests more concerned about profits than the health of average Americans.

However, all that alleged liberal compassion has not been powerful enough to cause Democrats to address the devastating impact of money-grubbing lawyers on health care costs. The obvious need for tort reform has been simply ignored, except for an occasional outburst of truth by Howard Dean.

By all means, liberals say, the working classes must be served, provided that the revenue streams which serve as the Democrat party’s cash cow are not threatened, especially with mid-term elections looming.

So much for the moral basis for ObamaCare!

In promoting ObamaCare, the president has promised that his plan will result in lower overall health care costs and will even reduce the federal deficit while “spreading the wealth” of coverage to millions of deserving Americans and millions of not-so-deserving illegal aliens,

ObamaCare is offered as a government solution to a very complex problem made all the more vexing by the greedy drive for obscene profits by medical professionals, pharmaceuticals, insurance companies, and other Republican capitalists.

That is, excepting ambulance chasing lawyers who are much too vital to the liberal agenda to be held accountable for anything except campaign donations.

Liberals fail to see the garbled message that is being delivered to the American people. Namely, greedy insurance companies and medical providers are out, whereas greedy lawyers are always welcome to feed at the public trough of health care compassion!

Overall, an apt description of ObamaCare and the people who support might be: Hypocrisy on steroids!

Think about it.

If President Obama really considered ObamaCare to be a prudent and quality solution, he would commit himself and his family to the same health care plan that he wants to download on 300 million people.

If he really cared, Obama would warn Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid that any bill which does not require the president and members of Congress to participate would the first victim of his unused veto pen.

Realistically, Obama’s liberal arrogance and holier-than-thou belief system will probably prevent him from acting responsibly.

This confirms that in his elitist mindset, Barack Obama sees himself as too good for ObamaCare!

Guess what Mr. President: So are the rest of us!


Contributor's website: http://voiceoflillpop.blogspot.com/



Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.
Please Note: The comments section is for both the registered users of this web site as well as non-registered users. All wishing to post comments must comply with our Commenting Rules or risk having their comments stricken. Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the ownership of this site and should not be taken as such just because they are visible and posted here.

One Response to “Is the President Too Good for ObamaCare?”

  1. Judy Doyle on December 1st, 2009 10:42 am

    First of all, this person living in our White House is NOT our president. Please stop calling him that. You demean the office when you do.

    I will not fly a flag until he is gone! What he does need to do is to stop paying attorney fees, over one million so far, to conceal his college transcripts, passport and long form birth certificate. He is a fraud. I will not allow his name to be spoken in my home. To me, he is the son-of-satan. That is what I call him, because I do not know what his real name is, I have to call him something and that is the nicest thing I can think about him.

    When did he change his name after he was adopted? Did he do it legally through the courts? Do you know his real name? If you don’t then please refrain from giving him the title of president. He demeans the office and our country.

Leave a Reply





  • American Conservative Daily is owned and operated by J.J. Jackson, President of Land of the Free Studios, Inc.