RSSSex: The Stimulus, the United Nations, Sexting, and Candy Wrappers
Gene Lalor | August 31, 2009
By now, everyone and his brother-in-law have heard the amazing tale of Jaycee Lee Dugard 
who was allegedly kidnapped by Phillip and Nancy Garrido and held for 18 years in a dump of a backyard.
We must say allegedly until the sick bastards are convicted.
She was allegedly raped by registered sex offender Garrido, bore him 2 children, and was finally rescued by the inept police of South Lake Tahoe, CA, when the whole dang “family” accompanied the lunatic to his parole office.
Reports now are that Jaycee, under the name Alissa, worked in Garrido’s store and apparently never made any effort to escape: http://bit.ly/5FFwy.
That info will no doubt fuel speculation that she was perfectly contented with her lot in life whereas Garrido probably knew that by then Jaycee/Alissa and her 2 children were as much mental/psychological captives as a physical prisoners.
Call it Stockholm Syndrome or anything else, JayCee now deserves the respect merited by a victim, not an accomplice.
As bizarre as that case is, it’s not the only weird sex situation on America’s landscape.
Case in point: Obama’s stimulus.
“Stim·u·lus (st
m
y
-ls) n. pl. stim·u·li (-l
) 1. Something causing or regarded as causing a response. 2. An agent, action, or condition that elicits or accelerates a physiological or psychological activity or response. 3. Something that incites or rouses to action; an incentive.” (TheFreeDictionary.com)
Obama’s stimulus package may have failed to stimulate jobs but it sure is helping to provide an arousal incentive for some.
The New York Post has uncovered some recipients of Obama’s taxpayer monies, namely sex, umm, “researchers.”
Among other misuses of Obama’s stimulus package are funds being generously doled out to Indiana University to study “correct condom use,” ($221,000), to Syracuse U. to investigate adolescent “hookups,” ($219,000), to the University Of Illinois, Chicago, to evaluate “drug use as a sex enhancer,” ($123,000), and to the University of Maryland, Baltimore, to examine the issue of how amphetamines influence “female rat sexual behavior,” ($28,000): http://bit.ly/4qmaYX.
Either rat sex is considered a low priority or U. Maryland is on Obama’s chit list. However, it’s good to see that over a half million of our hard-earned dollars are being spent constructively.
Look, like a drunk with oodles of money, our government figures that it’s either use it and waste it, or lose it. After all, it’s all designed to stimulate, right? And it’s the American way amd not the bureaucrats’ money.
Second case in point, The United Nations. 
Funded 22% by generous contributions from the United States, the U.N. is no slouch when it comes to wasteful spending by bureaucrats, either.
In fact, much of its profligate spending, especially but not confined to UNESCO, would be considered an immoral and unethical use of our taxes–if most of us knew about it.
Example: We have learned through song and tradition to teach our children well so it’s gratifying to know that the United Nations, ever on the alert for improving world conditions, is dead set on teaching and improving the condition of our young.
However, the Third World-dominated United Nations, thinking that Zambians, Kenyans, Uruguayans, and Cambodians share Americans’ beliefs and value system, would love to dump that system. UNESCO wants to teach our children but not exactly teach our Christian values.
Granted, it can be disconcerting to parents when their 5 year olds get discontented due to ennui. We used to tell them to dust or go out to play. The U.N. has a better solution, a different take on “play:” Teach them to masturbate!
Advocating universal access to “reproductive rights” and contending that “sexuality education is an integral component of human rights,” UNESCO has determined age-specific guidelines for children of all ages to learn and exercise their “sexual rights.”
. Children ages 5-9 also should be taught, “that all people regardless of their health status, religion, origin, race or sexual status can raise a child and give it the love it deserves.” (Note the inclusion of “sexual status,” the U.N.’s unsubtle endorsement of gay adoption; the pro-gay thread runs throughout the UNESCO report.)
. Children 9-12, among other things, should be taught about “homophobia, transphobia and abuse of power” as well as the “definition and function of orgasm.” By age 12, a kid should learn how “to be a good sexual partner.”
Children 12-15: “The report recommends discussing ‘access to safe abortion and post-abortion care’ and the ‘use and misuse of emergency contraception.’ “
UNESCO’s primary interests are a reduction in “depletion of natural resources” and teaching that, “traditional values on marriage and sex are faulty.”
The U.N.’s guiding lights? SIECUS and Planned Parenthood. (See “Homosexuality in America, Part Six: Indoctrinating Kids,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=647.) http://bit.ly/17SxbJ
Parents, don’t forget to get your kids out on Halloween to solicit pennies for UNICEF and maybe a few bucks for UNESCO.
Third case in point: Sexting”
Less bizarre, maybe, is the national craze of sexting, which relates to both Obama’s stimulus and UNESCO’s cure for youth boredom.
Nationwide, school kids are being instructed with the usual back-to-school messages of no kicking, punching, biting, or gum-chewing. Wait. That was in the old days.
Houston teens are getting a more modern reminder: No sexting!
Now that the sexting craze among teens–sending cell phone messages replete with nude or semi-nude photos of themselves–has reached almost pandemic proportions, Houston administrators are cracking down.
Reports are that 22% of girls and 18% of boys are engaging in the exhibitionist and dangerous practice so Houston schools have adopted a new rule: “Sending, receiving, possessing sexually suggestive messages is forbidden.”
Having finally become aware that sexting is a problem, a problem discussed here six months ago, (See “Teen Texting, Sexting, and Suicide, Parts I and II: http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=906 and http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=924), at least those Texans are waking up.
Overstating the obvious, one official said, “We want to put them on notice that it’s just not something that really belongs in school:” http://bit.ly/15gKDM.
That ban is sort of negative, not to mention counter-revolutionary.
I mean, here we have American universities studying condoms, random teen sex, and how drugs can arouse, we have the U.N. proposing autoeroticism, suggesting homosexual and abortion alternatives, and Houston is forbidding texting?
Don’t they all go hand in hand, so to speak?
Teach your children well!
Final case in point: candy wrappers
The UK’s Daily Mail, tongue firmly in cheek, reports on a sweet scandal. (Brits call candy sweets.)
“Simon Simpkins was buying Haribo MAOAM sour candies for his children when he noticed the ‘pornographic’ illustrations of limes, lemons and cherries romping with each other:” http://bit.ly/Im4Qv.
What Simon says is that “The lemon and lime are locked in what appears to be a carnal encounter.” On perusal of the wrappers, it looks like the cherries and that same lime are having a jolly, old toss in the fruit bowl as well.
Judge for yourselves by taking a peek at that website.
Whatever the fruits are up to, it may be sweet but I’ll vote with Simon.
Those libidinous fruits would be very tasty to sex researchers, U.N. ideologues, and sexting teens.
Contributor's website: http://www.genelalor.com/
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.
Leave a Reply
Loading ...Recommended Reading:
