Just exactly who are the undesirables?

Carolyn Hileman | July 15, 2009

Just exactly who are the undesirables?
Carolyn Hileman

In the words of Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. I think we have our answer as to what the liberal agenda has been since 1973, it has been about as she says eliminating the undesirables. Further evidence of this come from a book that was written in 1977 by our new Science czar John Holdren where he wrote “Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who “contribute to social deterioration” (i.e. undesirables) “can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” — in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational “Planetary Regime” should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives — using an armed international police force.”

The president has established procedures that would not only require all tax payers to fund abortions in the United States but in other countries as well, and it makes you wonder if this health care plan is just one more way to rid our country of undesirables. The next question would have to be who are the undesirables? If we go simply on the Supreme Court justices word it would have to be those on Medicaid, the working poor, those who can not afford to feed our house their own children. But if we read excerpts from Mr. Holdren’s book Ecoscience you begin to wonder, “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”

“If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.”

With this comes the question of are we working towards natural selection? If the health care plan is passed if you are too old to work, will you be deemed useless and therefore a burden on society? Babies, born premature will they be subject to death because they are to be a burden, babies born with defects will they be deemed a burden? The president uses the word burden a lot in referring to babies, has voted not to allow a baby born alive after an abortion to live because it would be a burden. What else and whom else does this man consider a burden? The cancer patient who has racked up bills so high they can never pay them, the heart patient who spends more time in the hospital than at home, your child that was born with a birth defect, that you love with all your heart, will they be deemed a burden? It is time to take a very close look at what these people plan to do, they can talk all day about the need for health care for everyone, but what kind of health care do they have planned, will this be a selection process where those deemed undesirable will be denied health care or simply exterminated? Just exactly who are the undesirables?

American Conservative Daily

Just exactly who are the undesirables?

Recommended Reading:

Contributors

News Feeds