RSSBirthers Versus Baby Killers
Carl Andrews | July 28, 2009
The folks who take offense against anyone who questions the legitimacy of the document Barack Obama claims is his birth certificate have hung the moniker “birthers” on people who raise such questions.
By and large, the people raising these question are conservatives, who are Pro-Life and anti-abortion.
We have written a few articles on this subject since World Net Daily broke the story of Major Stefan Cook, who had his orders to deploy to Afghanistan revoked when he questioned if Obama was eligible to be Commander-In-Chief caught our attention.
However, our interest in this topic is focused primarily on the possible constitutional crisis that may result is Obama is found to be ineligible to hold the office of the Presidency.
The folks suggesting the word “birthers” as an appropriate title are obvious Obama supporters, therefore it is only a logical conclusion that they follow a liberal political persuasion.
And the overwhelming majority of liberals consider themselves to be pro choice.
Consequently, in a spirit of fairness and bipartisanship, we propose that in the future, liberals, (who support abortion), henceforth be called baby killers.
After all, that’s what they are.
The title “pro choice” is an oxymoron.
What choice does the fetus have?
Can any of you liberal “pro choice” folks deny the fact that if a woman becomes pregnant, and if all other things are equal, the end result will be that a baby will be born?
Therefore, if that same woman has an abortion, she has in effect killed a baby.
So the baby killers title is appropriate.
Numerous web sites will continue to carry the argument regarding Obama’s birth certificate.
And the loudest voices will be heard from Obama supporters.
However, it’s ironic that these same people will also support a “health care reform bill” that would seek to withhold medical treatment from “those who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens.”
Many of these same people are demanding that abortion funding be included in the health care bill.
So they support what would , in effect, be state-sponsored euthansia, while at the same time demanding funding so that even more babies can be killed.
One of our subcribers summed it up best:
“That’s the difference between us and them.”
“Conservatives value all human life, from conception to death.”
Contributor's website: http://www.freedomedium.com
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.
Leave a Reply
Loading ...Recommended Reading:
