RSSGays On a Boston Warpath
Gene Lalor | May 3, 2009
I rarely disobey my bride of 41 years.
Well, that’s not actually true since I don’t feel I have to obey her, nor she me. Like the newspaper comic strip, “Pickles,” we have achieved a detente of sorts, meaning I do what I want and she does likewise.
She did request that I cease and desist with articles about our gay brethren since they were getting redundant and because homosexuals tend to misinterpret undue attention as subliminal interest in their activities and lifestyle. When that attention is invariably of a very negative cast, that’s as logical as interpreting attention paid to alien life forms suggesting innate desires to relocate to Uranus. Yet they persist.
Thing is, in the last year or so especially, homosexuals have shown they haven’t given up or let up in their various campaigns. To avoid referencing what they’re up to implies, to them, a craven cowardice which only encourages them to pursue their strategy of intimidating heterosexuals in order to achieve their goals of not just acceptance but endorsement and all that such acceptance and endorsement entails.
Rather than reiterate my views on their multi-faceted campaign of intimidation, their strategies, and goals, I suggest readers of this article type in “homosexuals” and/or “gays” on my website’s “Search” box to avail themselves of my dozens of well-researched, fully-documented, and brilliantly-written opinions on this topic.
Warning: Many of those articles are not for the faint of heart nor do they cater to that element in our society which adheres to the credo of “live and let live.” That philosophy would be fine and dandy with an adversary–and the Gay Lobby has indeed evolved into a potent and unrelenting adversary– which is capable of compromise and rational discussion. However, the Gay Lobby is fixated on a total, take no prisoners, victory.
If gays take any offense at that observation or to the content of those articles, then so be it. They should be advised that I take great offense to their agenda.
Some homosexuals get almost as turned on by the cowering of the straight majority as they do by teabagging, which is not a reference to the tea party tax protests of April 15th. No sane males would engage in the aberrant behavior which so attracts gays any more than they would encourage copulation between gays and orangutans. Gerbils seem to be their preferred partners, anyway.
Nevertheless, gays must be commended for their persistance as evidenced by their recent court and legislative victories permitting gay marriage despite overwhelming public opposition to that debasement of the institution of marriage.
Further testimony to their doggedness in pursuit of recruits from the ranks of school kids–something they deny vociferously–was last month’s outrageous “Day of Silence” staged in many of America’s schools.
Without needlessly elaborating on that now-annual event, suffice to say it involves a day promoted by many schools and dedicated to homosexual indoctrination as students are expected to sheepishly listen and learn about the wonders of being gay while being prohibited from commenting or protesting with objections.
The stated purpose of “Day of Silence” programs is to abolish bullying of homosexual students, which I would wholly endorse–if that were all the day entailed. See “Day of Silence”–”Day of Gay Seduction,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=931.
As I said, grudgingly to their credit, the new breed of homosexuals never gives up. Even a year ago I would have bet all I own that their chances of ultimate success didn’t have a chance in Hell but now I’m not so certain. They seem to have the bulk of the liberal mass media, virtually the entirety of the entertainment world, and an indeterminate but significant number of national and state legislators, and now the President of the United States, in their camp.
See here for a very favorable lesbian take on Obama’s pro-homosexual positions: http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianactivism/p/BarackObama.htm.
Not able to read minds, I can’t unequivocally delineate the motivations of gay advocates among the media and politicians although a reasonable surmise is that many closely identify with the gay agenda and, with politicos, also want their votes.
Absent a crystal ball as well as functioning powers of telepathy, I’m unable to predict the future with a great degree of accuracy. However, as of May, 2009, all indicators are pointing to an eventual, possibly imminent, smashing victory for the homosexual agenda and a crushing defeat for the forces of tradition, morality, and common sense.
Residents and churchgoers in downtown Boston can attest to the bitter scent of defeat in the air. Last Tuesday, they were harrassed by a phalanx of 30 extremely noisy gay protestors outside the Park Street Church and in an adjacent Revolutionary War graveyard in which American patriots such as Sam Adams are buried.
Chanting, screaming, and terrorizing the people in the church, the homosexuals distributed pamphlets saying “Jesus was gay!” and generally disgraced themselves and their movement, as well as violating various laws, which Boston police refused to enforce.
Apparently accustomed to disgrace and apparently immune from arrest and prosecution, they carried on as if they were accustomed to disgrace and immune from arrest and prosecution.
See the video of their brazen disruption of a church event, with some gay protestors in drag and some with bullhorns, here: http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/ParkStreetChurch_0428/index.html.
Their complaint? The church was conducting an informational religious conference for pastors to help them counsel homosexuals who wanted to escape from that Hell in which they live and from those biblical abominations in which they revel.
I’m not privy to the specific dialogue in the church any more than the protestors outside were. I very much doubt that those who were attempting to conduct the conference, considering their purpose, dwelled much on condemnation and the fires of Hell, but equal ignorance on the part of the gays posed no problem. They were repulsed by the very purpose of the conference.
For a more thorough examination of that shameful, and illegal, Boston demonstration and a host of similar efforts by gays to disrupt free and constitutionally-guaranteed public discourse and to terrorize those with whom they disagree, please see: http://www.massresistance.org/.
Unfortunately for law-abiding and decent people, the Boston debacle was but one, vile example of the tactics homosexuals are employing to show how implacable they are in seeking to squelch free speech and well-intentioned disagreement.
In a sense, they won that battle, which could be compared with another brief skirmish that occurred on the streets of Boston in 1770, the Boston Massacre.
No one was killed in 2009 but just as the murder of 5 colonists 239 years ago helped ignite the American Revolution, one can only hope that the Park Street Riot helps awaken Americans to finally rise up, speak out, and defend their rights to peacefully congregate to defend their heterosexual liberties against the hordes of homosexuals.
That historical analogy is an admitted flight of wishful fancy but at this stage of today’s battle, as we witness good succumbing to evil, hey, whatever works!
Message to the bride: Look, I tried!
Contributor's website: http://www.genelalor.com/
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.
One Response to “Gays On a Boston Warpath”
Leave a Reply
Loading ...Recommended Reading:
[...] Michael put an intriguing blog post on Gays On a Boston WarpathHere’s a quick excerptI rarely disobey my bride of 41 years. Well, that’s not actually true since I don’t feel I have to obey her, nor she me. Like the newspaper comic strip, “Pickles,” we have achieved a detente of sorts, meaning I do what I want and she does likewise. She did request that I cease and… [...]