RSSPro Abortion Advocates Proving Once Against They Are Not Pro Choice
J.J. Jackson | April 5, 2009
The pro abortion crowd doesn’t even like to be associated with abortion. That is why they falsely call themselves “pro-choice.” Of course, their version of “choice” is to remove choice from the child that is to be aborted and put to death without ever having committed a crime. On top of this, they react viscerally whenever someone dares to talk about the virtues of choosing life instead of abortion. And this betrays their true agenda.
Once again the pro abortion crowd is up in arms. This time they are feeling (not thinking as usual) betrayed by the DNC and Tim Kaine who as Governor of Virginia has allowed Choose Life plates to be manufactured by the state as are other fund raising style plates. The reaction from the pro abortion crowd has been typical.
“It is surprising that Governor Kaine would do this, but it’s all the more surprising that he would do it as chair of the DNC,” said Paulette McElwain, the president of the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood.
McElwain exchanged numerous calls with the governor’s office over the license plates and organized a grass roots effort that logged more than 2,000 calls to the governor’s staff.
“We provided him with abundant information,” she said. “We’re terribly disappointed that he decided to sign it.”
In Washington, NARAL/Pro-Choice America channeled more than 17,000 emails and 200 calls to the DNC urging Kaine to veto the bill.
“It is unfortunate that, even after receiving thousands of messages from Virginians and pro-choice activists across the country, Gov. Kaine has opted to sign a bill that advances a divisive political ideology at the expense of women’s health,” NARAL/Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan said in a statement.
I wonder what “facts” they provided the governor with? I doubt among them was the fact that once the egg is fertilized it is by every definition a human life. No, that “fact” is always overlooked by the pro abortion crowd who have among them radicals like Professor Peter Singer who actually thinks that children should be able to be retroactively aborted after birth. He arrives at this conclusion using the exact same non-reasoning that those who think it is ok to murder children in the womb do and because his arguments make sense (but only in so far as they use the same illogic of the pro abortion crowd) he is an embarrassment to them because an examination of his own beliefs show the fallacy of the pro abortion logic.
Yes, once again we see that from Planned Parenthood to NARAL members of the pro abortion crowd are by no means pro choice. That is, unless that choice is for abortion. And they see the Democratic Party as the party of abortion and murder which tells you all you need to know about the Democratic Party as far as I am concerned.
Boo hoo. Cry me a river.
Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.
One Response to “Pro Abortion Advocates Proving Once Against They Are Not Pro Choice”
Leave a Reply
Loading ...Recommended Reading:
If Roe v Wade had decided abortion was murder in 1973, we would have 50 million more citizens than we do now. 25 million could be working. If they made and average of $25,000 a year, their social security contribution would be $93.750 billion a year. Obviously, we didn’t want to save social security as much as we wanted to do our part to reduce the global population. Why didn’t we protect their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness ? We must have preferred to abandon the Constitution to accommodate those who would destroy the Constitution. We did allow the legal and illegal immigration required to keep social security barely breathing and now we have citizen terrorists.. Will we be ready to cede Minnesota to the Moslems ? We are now ready to cede our entire economy in order to do our part to reduce CO2 emissions. Are we certain we have to do that at all ? We’ve fought 22 wars over the past 234 years, some to gain territory, some were unnecessary, on average, one for every decade. Why has our liberty deteriorated ? There is a set of Liberal values governing our courts and our entire government that a majority of us do not agree with. If we put the abortion question on a ballot, abortion would be outlawed. We would be better off to trade the end to abortion for all government entitlements.