<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official: FDA to Approve Plan B for 17-Year-Olds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2009/04/official-fda-to-approve-plan-b-for-17-year-olds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2009/04/official-fda-to-approve-plan-b-for-17-year-olds/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of conservative offsets to combat annoying liberal global whining.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Prince (Moderator)</title>
		<link>http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2009/04/official-fda-to-approve-plan-b-for-17-year-olds/comment-page-1/#comment-71455</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Prince (Moderator)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevoice.name/?p=14810#comment-71455</guid>
		<description>As usual you have it purposefully backwards to justify your own beliefs.  The &quot;scientific&quot; facts are that from the moment of conception that little lump of cells is human life.  This is not even disputable.  Human life is guaranteed to be protected and not taken in the United States except for punishment for a crime either committed or being committed (self-defense).  Read your Constitution.

You obviously do not like that however and believe that life should be able to be taken on a whim.  In which case you would have been right at home it Hitler&#039;s Germany or Stalin&#039;s Russia because in both instances those glorious nanny states decided that large groups of people were not entitled to their right to life based on the argument that they were not wanted or good for society.

Those are the facts.  You will probably not accept delivery however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual you have it purposefully backwards to justify your own beliefs.  The &#8220;scientific&#8221; facts are that from the moment of conception that little lump of cells is human life.  This is not even disputable.  Human life is guaranteed to be protected and not taken in the United States except for punishment for a crime either committed or being committed (self-defense).  Read your Constitution.</p>
<p>You obviously do not like that however and believe that life should be able to be taken on a whim.  In which case you would have been right at home it Hitler&#8217;s Germany or Stalin&#8217;s Russia because in both instances those glorious nanny states decided that large groups of people were not entitled to their right to life based on the argument that they were not wanted or good for society.</p>
<p>Those are the facts.  You will probably not accept delivery however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Ronk</title>
		<link>http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2009/04/official-fda-to-approve-plan-b-for-17-year-olds/comment-page-1/#comment-71420</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Ronk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevoice.name/?p=14810#comment-71420</guid>
		<description>This should have been done a long time ago. The reasons for the FDA holding this back were theological and political rather than scientific. 

I&#039;m curious, what exactly do conservatives want? Complete abstinence? That will never ever happen. 

Conservatives don&#039;t want to care for these teen mothers and children. They don&#039;t want to educate teens or offer condoms. Do conservatives have any other ideas on how to deal with teen pregnancy other than abstinence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should have been done a long time ago. The reasons for the FDA holding this back were theological and political rather than scientific. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, what exactly do conservatives want? Complete abstinence? That will never ever happen. </p>
<p>Conservatives don&#8217;t want to care for these teen mothers and children. They don&#8217;t want to educate teens or offer condoms. Do conservatives have any other ideas on how to deal with teen pregnancy other than abstinence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 219/223 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.americanconservativedaily.com @ 2012-02-12 22:49:17 -->
