RSSLiberals Over Ameica
David L Lamon | January 29, 2009
I researched and wrote this paper several years ago prior to the 9/11 attack but now it has more relevance than ever before. The World Economic Forum is meeting in Davos Switzerland according to The forum’s founder, Klaus Schwab. He told CNN yesterday the current global economic slowdown is a “transformational crisis” that should be utilized to shape a “New World Order. Attendees range from multi-national corporations, governments, foundations etc. The Bilderbergers, CFR, Tri-lateral Commission, World Bank, Central Banks of nations among others think they have the right crisis now to bring about the kingdom of the Anti-Christ, which is what it will amount to according to scripture. I hope you find it informative but also to prepare your hearts for what is about to come upon the whole world to include America if you don’t make the rapture of the church. For example a quote from one of the architects of the New World Order: David Rockefeller—Founder and honorary chairman, Council of the Americas. Chairman , Council on Foreign Relations. Founder and Honorary Chairman, Trilateral Commission__We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nation will accept the New World Order. He also said, “Some even believe we (Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
Liberals
Over
America
David L. Lamon
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of moral crisis do nothing and many Republicans can count themselves dealt in. Ben Franklin “I think vital religion has always suffered when orthodoxy is more regarded than virtue. The scriptures assure me that at the last day we shall not be examined on what we thought but what we did.” The apostle James confirms this reasoning with James 2:18 yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
Republicans are the party of less governmental interference into your lives, but as we have witnessed they too have succumbed to the liberals even when they had control of both the Senate and House. The former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott admitted as much by saying that we can’t beat Bill Clinton. The purpose for me presenting this information is to inform you of what is happening in the land of the free and home of the brave, because as Thomas Jefferson said, “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will be.” When asked about the traitorous Jeffords of Vermont jumping parties, I say let him go, because he is a Socialist anyway. We don’t need people like that in the Republican Party. People like this coming into the Republican Party are nothing more than wolves in sheep clothing. I also say let McCain and Chaffee go if they want to rub elbows with the likes of Kennedy and Hillary. What I want to see are men with the backbone willing to stand in the gap and make a hedge against the Socialist One-Worlders and tell them constitutionally how the cow eats the cabbage.
There are those who say no honorable American would oppose the actions and policies of the U.S. government. We’ve heard Clinton so admonish us any number of times, but Teddy Roosevelt saw through this deception: “Patriotism means to stand by the country, it does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country.” How about our patriotism for Clinton or was it patriotism? I believe it was because of our huge population of Baby Boomer’s reliance on 401-K’s; we stood by him by a consistent 73% during his perjuring of himself and having sex with Lewinsky in the White House, plus the rotgut humanistic educational teaching in our public schools. Let me show you how easy it is for the government to gain control of someone’s mind? All the government has to do to gain control of the people’s mind is to gain control of their pocketbook. With the exception of some of the Fortune 500 companies, everyone’s retirement has been diverted into 401-K’s (stock market) and then they throw in a smidgen of fear tactics and zap they’ve got em’. Sounds like a recipe doesn’t it? The 401-K was put in place specifically for this purpose, which is nothing more than a tool of fear. Last year (2000) the average loss on 401-K retirement plans was around 18%. This should make it obvious to everyone by now how the federal government uses this tool for control purposes. Fear tactics is only one of many tools that will be revealed so stay tuned. Here is a quote from one of our founding fathers and another great American on this subject:
Ben Franklin
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety (security) deserve neither liberty nor safety (security).”
If a nation values anything more than its freedom, it will lose it says William Somerset Maughm. Furthermore, if its comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too.
U. S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Houghwout Jackson put it simply: “It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.” This justice’s comment is a far cry from what we hear from these “liberal lawmaking judges” today. “We the People are the rightful master of both congress and the courts, “ said Abraham Lincoln, “not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” A government that is anxious to give alms to as many people as possible is even more anxious to commandeer their earnings. Witness, through Federal, State, and local taxes, a man/woman pays 40% or better of their income in taxes. One might ask, “Why have we become a nation of such horrific lawlessness?” One of the main reasons is when the state becomes the violator of liberty and property rather than its guarantor; it debases respect for all law. People in society develop an increasing disrespect and disregard for what the law demands. They view the law as the agent for immorality in the form of legalized plunder for the benefit of some at the expense of others, and this same disrespect and disregard sooner or later starts to creep into dealings between individuals (trickle down theory). Society verges on the brink of lawlessness. Stop and think, when individuals began to ask government to do things for them, rather than merely to secure rights and property, they began asking government to violate others rights and property for their benefit. An example would be the leftist liberals demand that no one in America has a right to own property. Amendment 5 of the Constitution says private property can’t be taken for public use without just compensation, and yet (without compensation) we see story after story where the government (unchecked or unregulated agencies run amuck) goes in someone’s backyard and finds a mud puddle and declares it a wetland or finds a plant, that they think might be extinct and seize the people’s property in the so-called interest of preserving natural resources, again without just compensation. To sum up the liberal’s feelings concerning property rights, Peter Berle (president of National Audubon Society; board member Sierra Club) a well-known (Democrat) liberal leader said, “We liberals reject the idea of private property.” Put that in your pipe and smoke it Democrats! Are you starting to see where your Party has gone?
I have placed some of the founding fathers quotes in specific places in this document so that you can judge for yourself whether or not the liberal establishment of today is in tune with their thinking or yours.
It is important that you understand one of the reasons America is moving toward fascism today. It is because they have put aside the constitution as the rule of law or amended it through the use of unanswerable, un-elected bureaucrats to accommodate the one- worlders.
One of the first goals of tyranny is to create fear in the population, fear so paralyzing that the public will accept any measure to allay it. Make the threat onerous enough and the people will relinquish everything. The government is always presenting us with a crisis, whether it is health care, terrorism, crime, environmental or whatever they dream up. We the people are left with two choices, be consumed with the crisis or let the government solve the threat of the day by limiting, constraining, or removing freedoms. Remember the old Aesop fable about the horse tormented by a boar. Exasperated, Horse asked Man for help. “Certainly,” said Man, “I shall help you, but first you must let me saddle you up.” Agreeing to the terms, Horse found his problem quickly resolved, but found too, the price extracted was weighty: Horse’s freedom. Of course, the moral of this story applies directly to what we see happening in America today, which is a frightened and tormented people that is willing to horse-trade away its fundamental freedoms. Test yourself; are you afraid of the IRS? Do you have confidence in the FBI? Are you satisfied with the job being done by the BATF, CIA, CPSC, DEA, EEOC, EPA, FCC, FDA, FDIC, FERC, FTC, NLRB, OSHA, and SEC? What about the ATBCB, CFTC, FCA, FEC, FHFB, FMC, NCUA, NMB, NTSB, NRC, PBGC, PRC, SBA, SSA, USITC, AND USPS? Who’s checking up on all these agencies? Who’s looking for corruption? If corruption is found, who’s prosecuting? Who’s assuring justice will be served? Did you know that for every law passed by Congress, un-elected bureaucrats in government agencies pump out on average 18 new regulations, each with the force of law? If you checked the U. S. Constitution, you would find this sort of run amuck federalism isn’t allowed. When these powerful government agencies go astray and they do and will in the future, and your freedoms are at odds with the powerful central government, whose side will win? As Voltaire noted, “It is dangerous to be right when your government is wrong.” Another of our great founding fathers (Thomas Jefferson) imparted a bit of wisdom to us when he said, “When the government fears the people, there is liberty, but when the people fear the government there is tyranny. Former Congressman Henry Gonzales (deceased) said the plans are here whereby the government can evoke the military and arrest Americans and put them in detention camps in the name of stopping terrorism. The question is what do they consider a threat? The U.S. Senate has revealed the existence of a “Master Search Warrant” and “Master Arrest Warrant,” the latter of which (authorized by the Attorney General) directs the FBI to: Arrest persons whom I deem dangerous to the public peace and safety. Again I asked, “What is a threat?” According to the above it is whatever Janet Reno or any other Attorney General deems a threat to be. Remember, it was Janet Reno who said, “The religious right is the greatest threat.” Someone please explain to me what happened to the Bill of Rights in the derivation of these onerous laws and directives. Who stole Articles 4, 5, and 6? Of course at present only the Navy and Marines can do this because they are not subject to USC Title 10 Posse Comitatus prohibitions against using federal military forces for domestic law enforcement. Could it be anything that would impede the forward progress of the One-World Government? The people at Waco or Ruby Ridge must be examples of what they consider a threat. Bill Clinton took this a giant leap forward by creating an order (Presidential Directive #25) that says in a national emergency the U.N. would have the authority to come in and take over. Chew on that a little bit.
In a study done by Dixie Lee Ray, he noted that throughout the history of great democratic nations, they endured about 200 years before their fall from power and subsequent disintegration. In every case there appears to be a clear-cut sequence of stages:
From bondage to spiritual faith.
From faith to great courage.
From courage to liberty.
From liberty to abundance.
From abundance to complacency.
From complacency to selfishness.
From selfishness to apathy.
From apathy to dependency.
And from dependency back again into bondage.
Do you see the United States somewhere in this sequence? Has our great country been so compromised and corrupted that we’re now willing to march in lock step to our doom in the footsteps of other fallen nations? A British historian Alexander Tyler once said, “ A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government; they will only exist until the people find that they can vote money for themselves from the treasury and until the politicians find that they can distribute that money in order to buy votes and perpetuate themselves in power. Hence, democracies always collapse over weak fiscal policy to be followed by a dictatorship.
“A country which leads the world in homosexuality, promiscuity, pornography, divorce, abortion, violent crime, drug usage, alcoholism, and child abuse: a country which embraces its enemies (China through trade) while turning its back on its friends (Taiwan); and a country which turns its back on its spiritual, Christ-centered heritage while believing itself to still be the greatest – is ready for a major fall,” says Don McAlvany. It happened to Rome, Babylon, Persia, Assyria, Greece, and now America is on the verge of allowing it to happen.
Now let’s examine some topics to see where the Democratic Party liberal philosophy has taken us. You will be seeing quotes and back up information by some of the more noted liberal establishment; all Democrats by the way.
Note: It is the liberals through the use of their comrades in the press who say conservatives are mean-spirited.
Christianity
Andrew Codrescu—Editor, Exquisite Corpse__The evaporation of four million Christians who believe this crap {Second Coming of Christ} would leave the world an instantly better place.
George Washington
“Do not let any one claim to be a true American if they ever attempt to remove religion from politics.”
Founding Father, Patrick Henry__ “It can not be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians, not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ!”
Founding Father, John Quincy Adams__The highest glory of the American Revolution was this; it connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity. From the day of the Declaration…they (the American people) were bound by the laws of God, which they all, and by the laws of The Gospel, which they nearly all, acknowledge as the rules of their conduct.
John Quincy Adams
The Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer’s mission upon earth [and] laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity.
Benjamin Franklin
“Whoever will introduce into public affairs the principles of Christianity will change the face of the world.” This statement seems to contradict today’s version of separation and church doesn’t it?
Compassion
Lisa Myers—Reporter, NBC news__ It’s compassionate to spend money – even if there is not money there to spend and even if you’re heaping debt on the next generation.
Julianne Malveaux—I hope Clarence Thomas’s (Conservative Supreme Court Justice) wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease….He is an absolutely reprehensible man. Real compassion from the left, huh!
Rosemary Barkett—Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals__The defendant is a good man, except that he sometimes kills people. No comment on the victims.
Richard Lamm—Advisor to Bill and Hillary Clinton on healthcare Old people have a duty to die and get out of the way. These are the same two-face people that get in front of the camera and plead for more government handouts to the elderly. Of course, most of this is seen around election time. This kind of divisive talk may be one reason we are seeing a resurgent spirit of anarchism among our youth.
Extremist
Hillary Rodham Clinton—U.S. Senator, New York__Extremist are those individuals (conservatives) who insist on clinging to the Founding Fathers vision of America. They fail to provide a viable pathway from the cold war to the global village. (One-world government) Take that New Yockers, she’s your Senator you elected her.
Ted Turner—Turner Broadcast Network, CNN networks, vice president Time-Warner, owner of Atlanta Braves, donor of 1 billion dollars to U.N.__The Star Spangled Banner ought to be junked as our national anthem because it’s too “warlike”.
Senator Schumer—Liberal Democratic Senator from New York, Chairman of the Judiciary Courts subcommittee__Judicial nominees will be asked questions about their personal and legal positions on key issues, including but not limited to: abortion, gun control, homosexual rights, campaign financing, tobacco legislation, states’ rights, property rights, school choice, environmentalism, and separation of church and state.
Tom Jipping—Free Congress Foundation Commentary on the above__This runs contrary to 200 years of tradition, during which the Senate, with a few exceptions, conscientiously worked at insulating judges from politics. “To do as Schumer is advocating, is to know ahead of time how a judge will rule on issues, which is demanding that he violate his judicial oath before even taking it.”
George Washington was truly familiar with what was intended by our Founders. He said this in his Farewell Address: ” . . . the Constitution . . . till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all.” He emphasized his point with these words: “Let there be no change by usurpation . . . it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”
The Constitution has been changed by usurpation. It was not amended to legalize the expansion of the federal government.
Family (Good old wholesome, compassionate liberal philosophy)
David Brower—Founder, Friends of Earth, Chairman, Earth Island Institute. Twice nominated for Nobel Peace Prize__Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license…. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes only to citizens chosen for children. Now who is mean-spirited; sounds Hitleristic doesn’t it?
Family
Dr. Mary Jo Bane—Clinton Administration assistant secretary of administration for children and families in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Professor of Public Policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government__We really don’t know how to raise children. If we want to talk about equality of opportunity for children, then the fact that children are raised in families means there’s no equality….In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them. Really big on family values, huh!
Family
Dr. William Seawell—Professor of education, University of Virginia; funding received from Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation (as in Automobiles) and the Carnegie Foundation__Each child belongs to the state.
Family
UNICEF UN International Children’s Emergency Fund Sponsor of slogan__ “Every child is our child.” Reminds me of Hillary’s “It Takes A Village! The village she is really talking about is the U.N.
Family
The Democratic Socialist of America organization has many U.S. House members and they are all from the Democratic Party. These people are explicitly for gay rights, for abortion rights, for gun control, progressive tax system, and for taxing the wealthy. Their idea of family is this: Recognize the integrity and legality of all families — including those of lesbians and gay men. Pass the federal lesbian & gay civil rights bill. This information can be found on their website at www.dsausa.org/dsa.html. Below is a list of members that are representing their states in Congress:
Members of Democratic Socialist of America
of the U.S. House of Representatives
Executive Commitee
Staff Coordinator
Peter DeFazio, D-OR pdefazio@hr.house.gov
Ron Dellums, D-CA (DSA)
Lane Evans, D-IL
Major Owens, D-NY (DSA)
Bernie Sanders, I-VT bsanders@igc.apc.org
Nydia Velasquez, D-NY
Maxine Waters, D-CA
Bill Goold
202-225-4115
213 Cannon H.O.B.
Washington D.C.
20515
Members
Neil Abercrombie
Xavier Becerra
David Bonior
“David Bonior, Radical Leftist” attack journalism from Arnaud de Borchgrave, editor of the Moonies’ Washington Times Corrine Brown
George Brown
John Conyers jconyers@hr.house.gov
Eni Faleomavaega
Chaka Fattah
Cleo Fields
Bob Filner
Elizabeth Furse FURSEOR1@hr.house.gov
Jesse Jackson Jr.
Luis Gutierrez
Alcee Hastings hastings@hr.house.gov
Maurice Hinchey
Marcy Kaptur
Carrie Meek
Jim McDermott
Cynthia McKinney
George Miller gmiller@hr.house.gov
Patsy Mink
Jerry Nadler
John Olver
Ed Pastor edpastor@hr.house.gov
Nancy Pelosi SFNANCY@hr.house.gov
Lynn Rivers
Bobby Scott
Pete Stark petemail@hr.house.gov
Louis Stokes
Bennie Thompson
Mel Watt melmail@hr.house.gov
Lynn Woolsey woolsey@hr.house.gov
Freedom
Scott Shuger—Consultant to the federal government on National Service__The federal government should make national service mandatory and assign the Selective Service System the task of locating 18 year olds and matching them with national service slots. For the record Bill Clinton implemented this in America and we now have high school graduates that are not permitted to graduate because they haven’t fulfilled their community service responsibilities.
Once again, a ploy Hitler used to establish his dictatorship.
Life (Watch out all you Democratic Seniors, Euthanasia is on the way)
John Hardwig—Professor of medical ethics and social political philosophy at East Tennessee State University__The scarcity of world resources imposes a duty to die. A responsibility to end one’s life in the absence of any terminal illness…a duty to die even when one would prefer to live….a duty to die is more likely when you have already lived a rich and full life. You have already had a full share of the good things life offers.
Religion
Bill Clinton—Former Governor of Arkansas and President of the U.S.__The wrong kind of faith leads to division and conflict. These forces have nearly destroyed our nation in the past. We shall overcome them by replacing them with a generous spirit of a people that feel at home with one another. Who decides the right kind of faith and how does he intend to do so? Do you suppose we will see more political correctness doctrine via Billary Clinton?
Father Thomas Berry—Gaia worshipper. Dissident Catholic Priest and leader of the Temple of Understanding in New York City__Christianity promotes a deep cultural pathology of human greed and addictions. We must rethink our ideas about God; we should place less emphasis on Christ as a person and a redeemer. We should put the Bible away for 20 years while we radically rethink our religious ideas.
Dr. Paul Brandwein—Leading U.S. Child Psychologist__Every child who believes in God is mentally ill. Dr. Brandwein supports Values Clarification/Situation Ethics, which believes that a child should not be judged academically by his score (Values system being taught in public schools; more on this later) but more importantly a teacher should put emphasis on whether it is a child’s value system. In other words, it’s OK to kill, steal, have premarital sex if these things are part of his/her value system and they personally declare them as such. The important thing is not what values you choose, but that you have chosen them yourself freely and without coercion of parents, spouse, priest, friends, ministers, or social pressure of any kind. Reader this is the rich harvest of Humanism.
Peter Hoagland—U.S. Representative, Democrat Montana__Fundamental, Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in. The reason we have to regulate….church schools is that ….children that are not trained in state-controlled schools will not fit in.
Sovereignty
Boutros Boutros-Ghali—Egyptian Politician and former U.N. Secretary General__The time of absolute and exclusive sovereignty has passed. The U.N. must tax all nations of the world in such areas as financial transactions, fossil fuel use, and international travel. Now U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan reaction to Senator Jesse Helms warning to Americans that the U.N. wants to rob you of your sovereignty, “The U.S. can go to hell, we’re in charge now.”
Strobe Talbot—Rhodes Scholar, roommate with Bill Clinton in college, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State__Nationhood as we know it will be obsolete, all states will recognize a single, global authority….National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all. Strobe Talbot bragged about how the International Monetary Fund and the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade have diminished America’s sovereignty. The truth is he is right.
Animal Rights
Ingrid Newkirk–Strong Democratic Supporter and cofounder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)__Pet ownership is slavery. I don’t believe people have the right to life. That’s a supremacist perversion. “A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.” This phrase exposes the intelligence of this group wouldn’t you think?
Tom Regan—Professor of Philosophy, Democratic supporter__This man was asked if he was in a lifeboat with a baby and a dog, and the boat capsized, would he rescue the baby or the dog? Regan replied, “If it were a retarded baby and a bright dog, I’d save the dog.”
Capitalism
Andy Kerr—Executive Director, Oregon Natural Resources Council__We have ended the dreaded Communism, now we must end the dreaded Capitalism….We have to use less. Cutting our consumption by 75% is a very reasonable and relatively easily obtainable goal. Hello! Communism is not dead; China, Cuba, and the Soviet Union are very much alive and well. Russia and China still has their missiles pointed at us. Listen to what Mikhail Gorbachev himself said to the Politburo in November 1987: “Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about glasnost and perestroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal change within the Soviet Union other than cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep.” Notice which party (Democratic) constantly wants to cut military spending and which party (Democratic) tried to steal the election from Bush by not allowing our brave men and women in the Armed Forces vote be counted. Some prophecy experts say Isaiah 19 and Ezekiel 38 and 39 are prophecies concerning this very thing. These prophecies are talking about a sneak attack on America by Russia. Also, Mikhail Gorbachev is president of Green Cross. He and Maurice Strong have decided to launch the Earth Charter initiative. Correct me if I am wrong, but I don’t remember voting for any such initiative. With their support and implementation of the Earth charter, the Internationalist, liberals every one, wish to shred the U.S. Constitution, crush capitalism, and obliterate individual rights. Nice bunch, these folks! Sounds frightening don’t it? I should say so! Particularly when so many honest, law-abiding, intelligent people in nations around the globe are willingly buying into this line of hogwash and are tripping over one another in a race to join this Great Lemmings’ Crusade.
Maurice Strong—Under-secretary general of the UN and Canadian Environmentalist__Isn’t it the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about? What a wacko!
Judi Bari—Earth First__I think if we don’t overthrow capitalism, we don’t have a chance of saving the world ecologically. I think is possible to have an ecologically sound society under socialism. I don’t think it’s possible under capitalism. Judi take a little trip to the Soviet Union and China. Come back and tell us what you found in those Socialist Societies.
Environmental
For those of you, who are confused about the environmental concerns of America, be advised that those who would plunge us into a one-world government are using the environment as an instrument to that end. When trying to get at the truth of the environmental problem a lot depends on whom you ask. For instance, if you ask a Liberal Democrat environmentalist, he/she will tell you we are destroying the environment. If one asks a Conservative Republican environmentalist, he/she will tell there just simply is no proof to back up the claims of the far left environmentalist. While it may be true that we consume more energy than anyone else in the world, at the same time we have eliminated sharply the amount of emissions into the atmosphere. Do not be deceived by what you are hearing from the major liberal news media, which fully supports the implementation of a one-world government through the use of environmental regulation among other things. Consider a few facts to support this view. In 1955, 78% of America’s GDP (gross domestic product) was based in manufacturing. Today, thanks to the one worlders New World Order using as vehicles NAFTA and GAAT, WTO, along with the Multi-National Corporations our pillar of democracy (middle-class) has shrunk along with the manufacturing sector of our economy to 16%. What does this mean? Manufacturing plants by far, churn out more harmful emissions into the atmosphere than do the high-tech and service sector of the economy. If you looked at it on a per capita basis, America has done more to eliminate harmful emissions into the atmosphere than most nations simply by getting rid of or reducing middle-class paying manufacturing jobs. Simple math, less manufacturing plants means less pollution. As mentioned above, the Gross Domestic Product are goods produced in America and exported overseas and used here at home. One of the main reasons we are seeing such huge trade deficits is because we are purchasing more goods from overseas than we are exporting. What this means in simple math is an eventual bankrupt America. It doesn’t take a Rocket scientist to understand that you can’t keep buying more than you sell and stay afloat economically.
President Bush is taking the chokehold off of America’s ability to be a prosperous economy by undoing what the liberal Clinton/e-Gore administration did. For example, take a look at California (next to New York, the most liberal of states) and their energy situation. Because of years of neglect through stringent environmental regulations, they are paying a price for not supporting or allowing domestic production of energy and placing such costly environmental restrictions on business that they aren’t competitive in our global economy. This is also why many industries are leaving California. They use more energy than most mid-west states combined, and also important is the fact that one-third of America’s economy comes from California, which has a direct effect on America’s overall economy. Kind of a double standard wouldn’t ya think? In other words, they are willing for other states to do all the processing of energy for their consumption, but aren’t willing to take care of their own. Another example of what these environmental wackos are doing is land grabbing. During Clinton/e-Gore millions of acres of land have been gobbled up by the government without consultation with the states (or regard for their feelings about it). Now, this is as good an example as I can come up with to illustrate for you just how far these smoked-brained wackos will go.
Unfortunately, Dubya is in their camp on this one or bowed to pressure from the left. He let stand Clinton’s Executive Order concerning these public lands. I said it when I was a teenager watching the peace movement along with all the dope smoking, that my generation is in trouble because these freaks will be leading the country one day. The smart thing for us to do is to think of Dubya as a slight reprieve for us in his rolling back at least a part of the Clinton/e-Gore revolution, because if we continue on the path we are headed, we will wind up like the Roman Empire destroyed from within. I do think it is important to note the reason President Bush is pushing the Faith Based Initiative. Contrary to what you hear the Democrats and the press say, big business is not necessarily the Republican Party’s biggest ally. When one looks at this from the standpoint of donations, the past 10 to 15 years research from Capital Research Center reveals that corporations like AETNA, Merrill Lynch, Georgia Pacific, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, BP Amoco, Target Stores, foundations such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, and many other large corporations give nearly five times as much money to left-wing (liberal) groups and causes than to right-wing ones such faith based charities. In 1997, the latest on figures of this kind, found they donated $38.7 million to left-of-center groups advocating bigger government, more regulation, and higher taxes, versus only $8.4 million to groups advocating free market solutions, lower taxes and conservative reform. The largest recipients of corporate public affairs grants, eight are liberal leftist. These include the Brookings Institution, The Nature Conservancy, the NAACP and the National Urban League. The two more conservative beneficiaries are the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is only center-right and the American Enterprise Institute. This Institute ranked 10th in terms of grants received. So, what should you do? Pay about half attention to what the major news media says, go to church and listen to the preacher for truth, and go online for such news organizations as NewsMax, Jane’s, or WorldNet Daily.
Whether you realize it or not our economy is very fragile. The one-worlders by design know that to gain control of America, they have to eliminate the middle-class to have a rich and a poor by moving manufacturing jobs out of America. If you are still having a problem with these statements just look around you. In today’s economy, one either gets a high-tech job (which is currently sucking buttermilk) or a low-paying service job. Maybe this explains why we are working at the 1978 pay level. As we now know the high-tech sector of the economy is taking it on the chin. Remember instead of a strong manufacturing based economy, we are left with a stock market economy, which is also part of the overall design to bring America to its knees. Two areas for you to watch are areas that are virtually untouched at election time. Those two areas are the State Department and the Federal Reserve, both of which are working hand-in-hand to bring America to its knees. These two are under the control organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Tri-lateral Commission, which are dedicated to bringing about a one-world government. Funding for this task comes Multi-national Corporations, and Foundations such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford. Yep, that’s right outdoor sportsman you heard it right, the fellows that entice you to buy their trucks are funding a one-world government, plus organizations such as the Sierra Club, which is a far left organization that is against property rights. They (Ford Motor Company) disassociate themselves from the foundation for obvious reasons, but nevertheless, they are part of it. Ask yourselves why is it when presidential elections bring about a new change of the guard that the above (State Department & Federal Reserve) are never subject to major overalls too. Sounds conspiratorial, huh! Well all ye doubting Thomas’s just pay attention and notice your once sound retirement accounts that are now bound to the stock market keep dwindling.
Here is a principle (referred to as Precautionary Principle) laid out in no uncertain terms by the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development: “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Notice the way they speak and use the word states as in possessive form in reference to them being a part of the U.N. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. What’s the U.N. saying? It’s saying fact and scientifically proven principles will not necessarily be used in the formulation of world policy. Then what will? There’s the rub. If reason, truth, and scientific certainty are cast aside, then the door is swung open for whatever the elite power brokers of the world would wish. It’s all being done by design! “Precautionary Principle,” says William Norman Grigg, is, in short, “a license to lie.” If we swallow the concept (and it seems we have), then the Bill Clintons, Jane Fondas, Al Gores, Reed Nosses, David Rockefellers, Maurice Strongs, Ted Turners, Timothy Wirths et al. have the green light (pun intended) to transform our world into their playground, where they can establish a pagan-Gaia belief system as the world’s religion, socialism as the single economic and political system, and serfdom (slavery, involuntary servitude) as the proletariat (lowest social or economic class) lifestyle. In the name of protecting the environment look at what the U.N. has already produced:
The U.N. Convention of Biological Diversity, which directs half of North America to be converted into core wilderness areas off limits to human beings.
The U.N. Vienna Convention on Ozone Depleting Substances (plus the Montreal Protocol), which bans CFC’s (Freon and Halons) in the U.S.
The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which increases the cost of all fossil fuel based energy and reduces its availability.
The UN Convention on the Law of the Seas, which declares all non-territorial Seas of the world to be under UN authority, and establishes authority to impose global taxes on use of the waters. But the UN’s agenda is far broader than merely environmental matters. This meddling body has also produced:
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which delineates children’s rights that must be guaranteed by the state. This treaty tramples upon parents’ rights, allows the state (i.e. the UN) to interfere with family matters, and decimates rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
The UN Covenant on Human Rights, which states, in Article 13: Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law….Ergo: whenever the government wishes, it may limit, restrict, or even prescribe your religion in any way it chooses. The UN is an avid enemy of Christianity….In fact to take the place of Christian culture, the UN seeks to install pagan religion based on worship of ‘mother earth’ – as represented in the occult goddess ‘Gaia,’ “says Father Paul Marx, founder of Human Life International. Humm that last name Marx has a ring to it don’t it? The World Trade Organization (WTO) that we hear so much about these days, in conjunction with GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) provides for the first time the legal mechanism necessary for the UN to enforce all these onerous treaties and agreements. Comments David Russell: “The UN has laid claim to all the ‘global commons:’ the air, the oceans, the skies, natural resources outside the boundaries of nations….They have even proposed to tax coal, oil, gas, gold, silver, iron, and other minerals extracted from the earth…. They want to tax air and ocean travel, place a tax on the electronic airways by which we transmit our radio, television and other signals, even taxing sites for our satellites in the sky. Henry Lamb says, “the Commission on Global Governance believes the world is now ready to grant to the UN the authority to enter the sovereign borders of any nation to guarantee the ‘security of people’ as defined by the ‘rights’ expressed in the various international treaties and agreements.” This say I, is the shredding of the U.S. Constitution and the irrevocable collapse of this great country of ours.
In the above we find that the aim of the liberal establishment is to make slaves of us, but did our Founding Fathers have anything to say about this.
Patrick Henry
“Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
Control
Catherine Bertini—Executive Director, UN World Food Program__Food is power. We use it to change behavior. Some may call that bribery, but we do not apologize. David Russell explains: “’Hungry people can be easily manipulated and controlled.” Those who seek world dominance know the power inherent in controlling land use, housing, food, and food-producing capabilities. Once again we see the liberals’ compassion is eclipsed by their overriding political agenda: control, domination, and limitless power.
Education
Theodore Roosevelt once said, “To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society.
Chester Pierce—Professor, Department of Education Psychiatry, Harvard University. Humanist. New World Order Guru__Every child is America entering school at the age of five is insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our Founding Fathers, toward his parents, in a supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It’s up to you teachers, to make all these sick children well by creating the international child of the future.
John J. Dunphy—Humanist and Democratic Party supporter__I am convinced that the battle for humankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers that correctly perceive their role as proselytizers of a new faith, which will replace the rotting corpse of Christianity.
Scoring the Test
As quoted in Investor’s Business Daily Guide ‘Teaching Mathematics in California’ “the teacher’s job is not to judge the rightness and wrongness of each student’s answer.” If it’s not the teachers’ job to judge the rightness or wrongness of the answer, what is their job? Now run tell that!
Alfred Kinsey—Zoologist. Director, Institute for Sex Research. Author of the famous books Human Sexuality and the Male and Human Sexuality and the Female for which he used data derived from prisoners, rapists, homosexuals, pimps, male prostitutes, thieves, and others. Kinsey has been described as one who indulged in sado-masochistic homosexual acts and filmed his wife having sex with fellow researchers at Indiana University.
Hitler, Clinton, and Colin Powell__when Hitler began his movement to indoctrinate the country’s youth, membership was relatively small. Hitler youth membership totaled 108,000 in 1932, contrasting sharply with ten million or so German youth associated with nonpolitical organizations such as the Boy Scouts. Only 5 years later; however, ranks of the Hitler Youth swelled to nearly 8 million. The following year Hitler made membership compulsory by enactment of a law conscripting all German youth. An article in The New American quotes leftist historian William Shirer as saying: Recalcitrant parents were warned that their children would be taken from them and put into orphanages or other homes unless they enrolled their children in Hitler’s program. Although lacking in compassion, it’s an effective membership drive, huh! Clinton said, “Imagine an army of 100,000 young people restoring urban and rural communities and giving their labor in exchange for education and training….National Service will harness the energy of our youth and attack the problems of our time. It literally has the potential to revolutionize the way young people all across America look at their country and feel about themselves. Secretary of State Colin Powell apparently agrees with the president. When told, “General you can’t make that mandatory {National Service} because of the 1st, 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments. Powell replied, “They made me do algebra and service is as important as algebra.
For these and other compassion facists, the three R’s are “reading”, “riting”, and “regimentation.” Let me give you a current example of this doctrine; Walter Freiwillig, senior at the Eleanor Roosevelt High School, in Glenview Township, New York State. He was told he would not be permitted to graduate because he had not performed his school’s community service in a three-month period. This kid had already been accepted at three Ivy League Colleges—contingent of course upon his graduation. Walter explained that he had done over 400 hours of service, but to no avail because it didn’t follow the guidelines as set by the Federal Mandatory Community Volunteer Program Guidelines, which must be followed if the school is to receive federal school funds. The requirements are as follows: 50% of the time has to be spent tutoring underprivileged children. To be more exact this includes the beneficiaries of any volunteer project and must be of black or Latino descent, or victims of AIDS or breast cancer. Yes, the federal government has not only determined that volunteering is compulsory, it has specified what is proper and what is improper volunteering. Does the word serfdom (slave; one in feudal servitude) begin to describe what’s going on here? To be fair to these compassionate liberals, they did give him an opportunity to make it up. They told him he could demonstrate the use of condoms. He declined thank God!
Another Example: On June 8 the Associated Press reported an incident at an Indiana high school in which two young marines were turned away from their high-school graduating ceremonies because they appeared in full dress uniform. Pfc. David Hobbs and Pvt. Josh Beam were evicted from their graduation at Elkhart Memorial High School for violating the school’s dress code, which mandates the wearing of a tie under the graduation gown. The two young servicemen were escorted off school property without receiving their diplomas.
Can you imagine this happening in 1951, when dress codes were a more serious matter? The fact is an exception would have been made, but not today. Once again we see how the left has advanced. We see how patriotism has retreated. Instead of firing Marxist professors and teachers, who denounce the very state that pays their salaries, we have let them become tenured radicals.
Education (Goals 2000)
The Educate America Act makes the point quite unequivocally: All students will be involved in activities that demonstrate community service. If you don’t like it, if you don’t think its right for your son or daughter, if you object to the intrusion on your freedoms, well, tough. Our politicians including some Republicans keep talking about local control but these words are nothing more than a smokescreen to pacify concerned parents. The goal of education is no longer to teach the kind of literacy, wisdom, and knowledge we once considered essentials of responsible citizenship; it is to train world citizens – a compliant international workforce, willing to flow with the storms of change and uncertainty. So just what will your child learn today in this country’s public schools? Bu the way it is up for consideration very soon (2001) so call or write your Senator and House member to express your pleasure or displeasure with this Marxist Act.
Education
Outcome Based Education (OBE or Educational Psychologists call it Cooperative Learning)
It looks like he/she will learn to feel good even though he/she can’t read, write, or calculate says Phyllis Schafly. That’s called self-esteem. Under this system, the student is taught he/she should not try to achieve excellence because he/she must stick with the mediocrity of the class. This is called Outcome Based Education. It should be called, “We may be stupid, but we feel good about it.” The child is taught that every behavior or lifestyle is acceptable and must not be criticized. That is called ‘Diversity’ or ‘Tolerance’….And of course we all know that ‘diversity’ is the code word for the gay-lesbian agenda in the schools. Your child will learn that America is a bad and oppressive nation. That’s called ‘Multiculturalism’ or ‘National History Standards,’ because that is what they teach. Your child will learn to make his/her own decisions without adult direction about which kind of sex and drugs to do. That is called ‘Values Clarification’ or Decision Making’…. Your child will learn in school that his/her parents’ morals and religion are out of date. That’s called ‘Critical Thinking,’ or as some people say, it’s called ‘ Now let’s criticize your parents.’ Your child will learn it’s OK to spell words anyway he/she wants. That’s called ‘Inventive Spelling’….Your child will learn to confide in school counselors instead of parents. That’s called ‘Guidence’….And of course your child will learn to guess at words instead of sounding them out and skip over words that he/she doesn’t know. That is called ‘Whole Language.’ An OBE high school in Iowa gave students a test without the parents knowledge or consent. Listed were 15 nationalities and religions, such as German-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, Jews, Catholics, Protestants, etc. The question. “Which of the above do you think would be most likely to eliminate an entire race?” Another question. If you could eliminate an entire race, would you? If yes, which one? One teacher’s explanation of why children aren’t learning in America’s public schools is, “We’re attempting to make sure they have the right vitamins, the right minerals, the right condoms, the right family planning; I don’t have time to teach them to read. In summary on education Phyllis Schlafly put it best, “ Outcome Based Education is completely consistent with the Dewey philosophy of making socialization the goal rather than individual achievement. This is what John Dunphy (Humanist) meant in the above statement, “I am convinced that the battle for humankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers that correctly perceive their role as proselytizers of a new faith which will replace the rotting corpse of Christianity.”
Gun Control
AMENDMENT II of the Constitution__ A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Adolph Hitler-German dictator__This year will go down in history! For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police will be more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future. By seizing all weapons, Hitler rendered the people defenseless, thereby making it easy to eliminate anyone who opposed him. Observed Thomas Jefferson: “When the government fears the people there is liberty; when the people fear the government, there is tyranny.” James Madison said, “Americans never need fear their government because of the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation. The Communist Rules of Revolution say, “Register all firearms, under any pretext, as a prelude to confiscating them.” Do you sense a little déjà vu going on right here in the good old U.S.A.?
Janet Reno—Attorney General for President Bill Clinton__The most effective means of fighting crime in the United States is to outlaw the possession of any type of firearm by the civilian populace.
Memo from Handgun Control Incorporated
We cannot survive into the 21st century unless we remember the need to expand our wave to new thinking to the total disarmament of America. The proof’s in the pudding! In Kennesaw, Georgia they have an ordinance that requires heads of households (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes. Since this ordinance was enacted, there have been two murders (one each in 1984 and 1989), both with knives. After the law went into effect in 1982, crimes against persons plummeted 74% compared to 1981, and fell another 45% in 1983 compared to 1982. The evidence in Kennesaw and elsewhere indicates that where civilians are armed, the crime rate goes down. One study found that concealed handgun laws reduced murder by 8.5% and severe assault by 7% from 1977 to 1992. If “right-to-carry” laws had been enacted across the country during that period, 1,600 murder victims would be alive today and 60,000 assaults would have been thwarted.
Let’s say you’re a crook. Where would you wish to practice your craft? In a neighborhood where all your potential victims have guns, or in a neighborhood where the government has taken all the weaponry away?
Question on U.S. Forces questionnaire:
The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty-day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement: I would fire upon U.S. citizens who resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government.
ƒ-Strongly Disagree ƒ-Disagree ƒ-Agree
ƒ-Strongly Agree ƒ-No opinion
This is but one of many questions our young and older soldiers were asked. The response to this question is as follows: 90% the newer recruits gave the response, “If it’s the law and they order me to do it, I guess it’s okay.” However, of those with more than 15 years service, 87% replied that they “disagree” or “strongly disagree” with the statement. I am wondering why it was circulated at all! Could it be that all the German and other country’s soldiers located in America are really training for the day when our government’s liberals gain control of the all three branches of government, that they will unleash these soldiers upon us to surrender our guns and kill us if we refuse? If you want more on this questionnaire contact me at the address above.
U.N. Targets American Gun Owners
Wayne R. LaPierre is executive vice president of the National Rifle Association
Saturday, May 12, 2001
The endgame … includes overriding national sovereignty regarding firearms.
A push for United Nations action on global gun bans – expected in July – has been preceded with release of a propaganda video that paints its message blood red, and I quote: “A gun born … a killer is on the loose … small arms are not fussy about the company they keep … and they can murder indiscriminately.”
This film – “Armed to the Teeth: The Worldwide Plague of Small Arms” -is a prelude to a U.N. conference on a global gun control scheme that could affect Americans’ future right to keep and bear arms.
“The United Nations Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and All Its Aspects” will be held in July at U.N. headquarters in New York.
This sounds like an effort to target gunrunners and terrorists, but only in part. And therein is the trap. Opposition to the U.N. summit will be smeared as support for international crime. That would be a lie. Our opposition stems from something that should be dear to all Americans – our national sovereignty and individual freedom.
This summer’s conference culminates years of work by a host of leftist groups, many working under the direction of the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) and the U.N. Preparatory Committee (PrepCom), which met this past January and published a manifesto they hope will override our Bill of Rights.
It is called the “Draft Programme of Action … .” In its foggy dialectic, “illicit” doesn’t mean what a reasonable person might think it means. In their translation, our guns are also ultimately “illicit” guns. Further, “All Its Aspects” also covers legal commerce in firearms, and legal private ownership.
Among those associated with IANSA’s worldwide gun ban efforts are: Coalition for Gun Control, Canada; Coalition for Gun Control, New Zealand; Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, U.S.; Million Mom March, U.S.; and National Coalition for Gun Control, Australia.
These groups seek worldwide gun control measures that include international firearms registration and primacy of the “world criminal court” over violations.
The IANSA lists among its major funding sources: the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, Ploughshears Fund, The Compton Foundation, Belgian Ministry for Development Cooperation, Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the United Kingdom Department for International Development.
Virtually alone against this array of richly funded international pressure groups is the NRA.
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists advises, “If activists want to fight the NRA and like-minded groups on the international level, they must confront them at home, because domestic and international weapons issues are intertwined.”
Anyone who argues that this international battle is only about terrorists and illegal guns need only look at what the global gun control forces are saying. In a pre-conference planning session in January, IANSA reported, “The speakers urged the Conference to take action in key areas affecting both the legal and illegal trade including … controls on the availability, use and storage of small arms within states, including strong domestic firearms regulation as well as a prohibition on the sale and possession of military weapons by civilians.” And in their view, any firearm ever used by any armed forces or based on military design is a “military” weapon.
The endgame – which includes the aggressive use of “transnational” power, thus overriding national sovereignty regarding firearms – is the collection and destruction of firearms, including guns from what they condescendingly call in U.N. bureaucratized “civil society.” That’s you and me.
The Draft Programme demands the U.N. be empowered: “To ensure that all confiscated, seized or collected small arms and light weapons are destroyed expeditiously … To encourage States [countries], in the interests of awareness raising and confidence building, to carry out public destruction events. To develop a reference manual on ecologically safe methods of small arms and light weapons destruction.”
What they are really after is all guns, worldwide, save for those in the hands of governments and the elite.
There is no doubt that American gun owners are the target. In the short term, the global disarmament crowd, at the very least, will open a campaign to shame America into joining its English-speaking cousins in Canada and crime-ravaged Britain and Australia.
The stated goal of the U.N. gun control boosters is “eliminating the conditions that foster reliance on private arms for self-defense.” Well, the primary “conditions” are a knowledge of history and a love of freedom. There are watchwords for who we are: independent, strong, and free. At the forefront of our independence, strength and freedom today is the NRA.
United Press International (UPI) reports that U.S. troops may participate in the disarming of extremist Albanians. Without giving much thought to the possible ramifications of this action one could justify doing this in the name of stopping the killing; however, if one considers the possible consequences of this action, the question has to be asked, could this be a prelude to using U.S. troops or for that matter foreign troops (they are already here in America training) to disarm Americans that the liberals decry as extremist? Consider this, it might be difficult for us to justify at least in the media our going around the world and disarming people and not disarming our own. By the time you finish reading this paper, you will have a pretty good understanding about what the liberals call extreme. It is anything or anyone that does not support their one world government agenda.
In Britain
David Breden__Countryside Alliance, Great Britain
It’s crystal clear that legally held firearms are not the problem and that the existing gun laws do not lead to crime reduction and a safer place to live
In a study released late last month (July 2001), researchers found that the criminal use of handguns in Britain had increased by almost 40% in three years, to 3,685 incidents from 2,648. The study was sponsored by the Countryside Alliance, which represents farmers, rural landowners and the hunting community.
Father of our country about Gun Control
George Washington__A free people ought to be armed. “The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.”
Media
Richard Salant—Former president of CBS News__Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.
John Swinton—Former Chief of Staff New York Press Club__There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. You wouldn’t dare write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand, that it would never appear in print. The business of journalists is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly this toasting of an independent press. We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes. Winston Churchill said, “The worst crime is not to tell the truth to the public. The crime endures, flourishes, and overwhelms.
Bernard Goldberg—Commentator on CBS 48 Hours television program__We in the press like to say we’re honest brokers of information, and it’s just not true. The press does have an agenda.
Paul Watson—Co-founder of Greenpeace__It doesn’t matter what is true; it only matters what people believe is true….You are what the media define you to be.
Benjamin Crowninshield Bradlee—Former Executive Editor Washington Post__To hell with the news. I’m no longer interested in news. I’m interested in causes. We don’t print the truth. We don’t pretend to print the truth.
Dr. Gene Schroder in his book Constitution Fact or Fiction: tells us that through the insidious, yet steady encroachment of ‘emergency powers,’ the government has now achieved the ability to rule the people by statute or decree, without the vote or consent of the ruled. Since 1933 America has continued under the ‘unconstitutional dictatorship’ of war and emergency powers. Don McAlvany reports: Executive order 12919, released by President Clinton on June 6, 1994, spells out some of the powers that the president assumes under a national emergency. In it he assumes the power to control all transportation, all forms of energy, all farm equipment, all fertilizer, all food resources, all health resources, all metals and minerals, and all water resources. The only so-called emergency power of the Constitution reads as follows: the privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus is the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action. The Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public safety may require it. (Article 1, Section 9) Since the clause in question resides in Article 1, it was obviously intended that only the legislature should make such a declaration. Any President who would assume ‘commander in chief’ powers, ‘war powers,’ declare ‘emergencies’ to assume powers not delegated by the Constitution should be laughed at as a buffoon.
Media
Linda Bowles—National Syndicated Columnist World Net Daily
Liberal Press’s Attack of Bush on Global Warming
Several European leaders treated President George Bush with official cordiality and unofficial slight. A sensationalist, gossipy European press, which presented the president of the United States as a Texas cowboy with stupid ideas about foreign affairs and global issues, also savaged him unmercifully. This is to say, Bush was treated much the same way as American liberals and the American “mainstream” media treat him.
The European Union, which consists of 15 countries, differed with Bush on many issues, including his intention to develop a defensive shield against nuclear attacks. The core issue that ruffled foppish European feathers was Bush’s firm belief that the Kyoto Protocol is a seriously flawed approach to solving problems associated with global warming.
Prime Minister Goran Persson of Sweden put it bluntly: “The European Union will stick to the Kyoto Protocol and go for a ratification process.” He suggested that America was pursuing a “wrong policy” that would endanger the global environment.
Could it be true that President Bush is wrong in rejecting the Kyoto Protocol? Most Americans probably think so based on widespread news accounts of a report on global warming recently delivered to the president by the National Academy of Sciences. For example, CNN’s Michele Mitchell said the report represented “a unanimous decision that global warming is real, is getting worse and is due to man. There is no wiggle room.”
Richard S. Lindzen, professor of meteorology at MIT, was one of the 11 scientists who prepared the NAS report. He wrote in a Wall Street Journal editorial that the full report (as opposed to the summary report) made it clear “there is no consensus, unanimous or otherwise, about long-term climate trends and what causes them.” In effect, the mainstream media got it wrong.
The panel on which Professor Lindzen served was asked by President Bush to evaluate the work of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, paying special attention to the Summary for Policymakers, which is the document most often quoted by those who endorse the Kyoto accord.
Lindzen writes that the Summary for Policymakers is a distortion of the full IPCC report: “It represents a consensus of government representatives … rather than of scientists. The resulting document has a strong tendency to disguise uncertainty, and conjures up some scary scenarios for which there is no evidence.”
Lindzen took no chances that he would be misunderstood. Speaking as a scientist, he wrote, “I cannot stress this enough — we are not in a position to confidently attribute past climate change to carbon dioxide or to forecast what the climate will be in the future.”
As an analyst of current events, and not as a scientist, I would pose these questions: If those who designed the Kyoto Protocol were genuinely convinced that global warming is a man-made threat to the planet, why would they exempt from its provisions the activities of 80 percent of the world’s population? Why would they exempt over a hundred countries, including China and India, the No. 2 and No. 3 largest producers of greenhouse gases in the world?
A case could be made that the Kyoto Protocol is not about global warming at all. It is about using environmental fears to advance an egalitarian political agenda, defined as: empowering global governance, overriding national sovereignty, redistributing the world’s wealth, and punishing the United States for its economic dominance.
In his book “Global Greens,” James M. Sheehan cites a cogent question asked by Canadian journalist Elaine Dewar: “How do you persuade (citizens in democracies) to give up sovereign national powers? How do you make them hand over power to supranational institutions they cannot affect, control or remove? You make it seem as if this will serve their best interests. You terrify them with the grave dangers national governments cannot protect them from.”
If we ratify a global treaty mandating restriction of greenhouse gases, United Nations bureaucrats, indifferent to our Constitution, will be crawling all over America inspecting our factories, cars, appliances, fireplaces, energy taxes and environmental laws. They will issue compliance demands and impose penalties. It is a globalist’s dreams come true. America’s intellectual elite and the media dupes who parrot them have redefined patriotism and national self-interest. They and the socialists in Europe call President Bush an isolationist and a unilateralist because he will not cooperate in the leveling of America’s greatness and the elevation of a global government, whose mission is to enforce an equal distribution of misery throughout the world.
Media
David Horowitz—Front Page Magazine Editor-In-Chier__AIDS is without question the worst reported story in the history of American journalism. From the press coverage of this anniversary, no one can take any hope that — in the absence of a scientific breakthrough — the next 10 years will show any improvement in the mortality statistics. Without accurate information about this politically induced tragedy, there is no chance that the American public will wake up, and finally decide that enough is enough. This is the worst reported story in the history of American journalism. If you read every account of this 20-year anniversary, there was never any attention to the public health problem …
You will read many stories about the heroic efforts of activists in the gay community to lobby the government for more AIDS money, and to care for the sick and dying. None of these efforts should be confused with public health methods for combating epidemics, however. What you will not read is a single story about those methods, or how epidemics were combated — often successfully — for a hundred years prior to 1981, before gay activists inserted themselves into the public health system. What you will not read is how the proven public health methods were opposed by AIDS activists, and how public health officials surrendered to the activists’ demands for veto control over which methods were acceptable and which were not, or how they then colluded in subverting the system that had proved so successful in the past.
What you will not read is any evaluation of the AIDS campaigns — mainly “education” — that the activists demanded in place of the proven methods. Yet the harrowing figures released on this anniversary show these politically correct billion-dollar campaigns have failed miserably to contain the epidemic or to prevent it from spreading into other communities, particularly the African-American and Hispanic communities.
As a result of the obstruction of testing, reporting, contact tracing and infection-site closing by gay leaders and their allies in the Democratic Parties that controlled these cities, public health officials could not warn communities in the path of the epidemic — in fact, were not able to find out what that path was. As a result by the end of the first decade of AIDS, Hispanics were 14 percent of those infected and blacks were 26 percent. A decade later Hispanics were 19 percent of those infected and blacks an astounding 45 percent.
What you will not read in the 20th anniversary coverage of the epidemic is any story on the fact that today — as we move into the third decade of the epidemic with infection rates rising and the death toll climbing — the subverted public health system still does not require reporting of individual cases, testing of at-risk communities, contact tracing to warn individuals of possible infection or the closing of sex clubs and other potential sites of infection.
Thus, in addition to being a grim anniversary from the vantage of the dead and those who loved them, this is a disheartening occasion for those of us who have paid attention to the course of this contagion and have watched in disbelief the criminally ineffectual efforts that have been deployed in the name of political correctness to contain it. This anniversary also makes clear that, as a nation, we have learned nothing from the follies of the past, and are headed into the next decade still prisoners of orchestrated ignorance and still relying on the remedies that failed.
The reason for the lack of honesty or forthrightness of the facts concerning the AIDS epidemic is the left-wing leaders of the gay community, not all gays, but the spokesmen for the community subverted the public health system. They were defending what they considered a revolutionary gay lifestyle. They did not want the infection to close the bathhouses; they did not want to focus on promiscuous anal sex, which is the absolute, primary sexual cause of AIDS transmission. If you do not engage in promiscuous anal sex, you are extremely unlikely to get this disease. They don’t want any of this discussed, which it hasn’t been. And they want all their eggs in one basket, which is a vaccine. I attended a conference organized by the city of San Francisco, with many doctors attending. Diane Feinstein organized it. This was in 1983, at the outset of the epidemic. They said very clearly that there may never be a cure for AIDS. These are the scientists speaking. And we may not have a vaccine for five to 10 years. They were extremely optimistic; it’s been 20 years. Therefore, they say, the only way to stop this epidemic from spreading is a public health message. You have to identify who the carriers of the disease are and separate them from people in their path. That’s a fundamental way to fight an epidemic. A lot of hysteria was whipped up that if people were identified, they’d all be put in concentration camps, or something like that, and we hear …
Don Frances, of the CDC (Center Disease Control) was asked about the confidentiality issue. And he said we have been studying gay diseases since before Stonewall, which is 1969 and gay liberation, and I don’t know of a single case where there was a breach of confidentiality. The public health system kept records confidential, except doctors would know, and they would know the epidemic is exploding in this area, let’s close down bathhouses, let’s warn people …
On the question of AIDS worsening, Mr. Horowitz explains, “Yes. What the press allows itself to report is the fact that infection rates are going up, that now the black community accounts for 45 percent of the infected.”
The plague abettors
Through 20 years of political correctness and political pressure, the gay establishment has caused AIDS to spread like wildfire.
Linda Marsa—Health Writer for the Los Angeles Times__ the AIDS epidemic is more accurately described as a product of the gay rights movement of the 1970s, inevitably concentrated in the very centers of gay life in America — San Francisco, New York and Los Angeles — and impossible to conceive without the presence and agitations of the radical gay movements that directly preceded it. It was the gay radical left that defined promiscuous anal sex with strangers in public urban environments — the primary cause of the AIDS epidemic — as “gay liberation.”
It was the gay movement that thought nothing of the massive epidemics of amoebas, rectal gonorrhea, syphilis and hepatitis B that swept through gay communities in the decades preceding AIDS, producing astronomical infection rates and depleted immune systems in the process. It was the gay movement that regarded any intrusion by public health authorities to close the public sexual gymnasiums called “bathhouses” as a “threat” to gay liberation (both before and after the onset of AIDS).
It was the gay left that successfully prevented reporting, testing, contact tracing and other public health methods that had been proven effective in combating epidemic diseases in the past. It was the gay left that blocked government prevention programs from targeting at-risk communities (using the same lie as the Times writer — that “AIDS is an equal opportunity disease”), and it was the gay left that persuaded government officials instead to put all the anti-AIDS eggs in the basket of incredibly expensive and — as everyone can now see — completely ineffective “education” campaigns. These campaigns were ineffective because — out of considerations of political correctness — they did not specify anal sex as the primary sexual transmission route and were addressed not to those who were specifically at risk, but to “everyone,” and thus in effect to no one.
The late Michael Callen, creator of the organization People With AIDS and a pioneer of candor in the midst of these lies, described how he had come to New York as a young man from the sticks and heard gay radicals like the writer Edmund White address audiences in the gay community on the subject of sexual liberation. White told one such audience that Callen was in that “gay men should wear their sexually transmitted diseases like red badges of courage in a war against a sex-negative society.” As a young romantic listening to this siren song of the left, Callen’s natural response was to think: “Every time I get the clap I’m striking a blow for the sexual revolution.” The ever-courageous Camille Paglia pointed out some years ago the obvious truth: “Everyone who preached free love in the Sixties is responsible for AIDS. The idea that the AIDS epidemic was somehow an accident, a microbe that sort of fell from heaven is totally absurd. We must face what we did.” Callen explained exactly what “we” did: “Some of us believed we could change the world through sexual liberation and that we were taking part in a noble experiment. Unfortunately, as a function of a microbiological … certainty, this level of sexual activity resulted in concurrent epidemics of syphilis, gonorrhea, hepatitis, amoebiasis, venereal warts and, we discovered too late, other pathogens. Unwittingly, and with the best of revolutionary intentions, a small subset of gay men managed to create disease settings equivalent to those of poor Third World nations in one of the richest nations on earth.”
It was a tragedy that those who pioneered in the establishment of gay rights should have been addicted to a radical illusion that they could also change the world — including the laws of nature. But that is what happened. This left went on to exert a controlling influence on the battle against AIDS, which sabotaged it from the start and has been directly responsible for the killing fields left in its wake. This includes especially the spread of AIDS into the black and Hispanic communities, which could have been prevented if traditional public health methods had been aggressively deployed in the early years. The Hispanic and black communities are for the most part separated in many ways from the gay communities where the epidemic first took hold. If there had been testing and tracing of those infected and focused warnings to those in their path, who knows how many lives could have been saved in the gay community itself, but especially in communities that lay outside the zones of the initial infections.
I offer these observations with no hope that they will have an effect. I have written about this “radical holocaust” (as I described it in “The Politics of Bad Faith”), for nearly the entire duration of this terrible epidemic. Many others have raised their voices as well. Michael Fumento’s “The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS,” and Gabriel Rotello’s “Sexual Ecology” have made the case for ending the political domination of the war against AIDS in a more scientific manner. Early ACT-UP radicals like Larry Kramer, Michelangelo Signorile and Gabriel Rotello have had second thoughts about their former attitudes and have faced what they did. They have organized in an effort to turn the tide. But to no avail.
The chief obstacle to any change in this story is the media itself. AIDS is without question the worst reported story in the history of American journalism. From the press coverage of this anniversary, no one can take any hope that — in the absence of a scientific breakthrough — the next 10 years will show any improvement in the mortality statistics. Without accurate information about this politically induced tragedy, there is no chance that the American public will wake up, and finally decide that enough is enough. When one considers that only 3 percent of the US population is made up of gays, one has to wonder how is it they are gaining alarmingly high power in the affairs of government concerning this abomination. Someone in power has to be touting this backed with big bucks. According to the prophecy of Daniel concerning the anti-Christ it says he favors homosexuality over heterosexuality. This is the prophecy for one to consider. Da 11:17 He shall also set his face to enter with the strength of his whole kingdom, and upright ones with him; thus shall he do: and he shall give him the daughter of women, corrupting her: but she shall not stand on his side, neither be for him.6 7 17. 6. Upright… or, much uprightness: or, equal conditions 7. corrupting: Heb. to corrupt Da 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
On the issue of Gun Control look at how the media has treated it and you will see their obvious bias on this subject. Every time a firearm is used in a high-profile crime, calls for stricter gun regulation — even outright prohibition — are pounded into us by a press that has taken sides. In fact, when it comes to guns, most journalists have clearly made up their minds. According to a recent study, television news stories calling for stricter gun laws outnumbered newscasts opposing such laws by a ratio of ten to one. In other words, we are hearing only one side of the story. In “The Seven Myths of Gun Control,” award-winning journalist and best-selling author Richard Poe cuts through the blizzard of anti-gun propaganda and uncovers the truth about guns, crime and freedom. He details the seven most common arguments used by gun prohibitionists, debunking each one with a wealth of statistical and legal data gleaned from top experts in the field of guns and gun rights.
Provocative, accessible and persuasive, “The Seven Myths of Gun Control” is a thoughtful and invaluable contribution to the national debate about guns. This book can be purchased through WorldNet Daily’s online store. I am not in the business of selling books for people, but if you are a gun owner and care about keeping your guns, you need to arm yourself with this book, so buy it, read it, and you will never again be deceived by the falsities that abound concerning gun ownership. As these people have done to other nations of the world they prey on your feelings to make you feel guilty about owning a gun, after reading this book you won’t feel any guilt whatsoever. As a matter of fact you will have an even better understanding of how the one-world government dictatorship is using this as a tool to disarm America.
Aside from college professors, and the socialist in Washington, here is a fair sampling of how the news media is pushing gun control. If we just look at the four major news networks, ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN we can readily see their role in the gun control issue. Here is the breakdown as published by the Media Research Center in a period of a year:
ABC NEWS
43 anti-gun stories to three pro gun stories
NBC NEWS
43 anti-gun stories to five pro gun stories
CBS NEWS
28 anti-gun stories to three pro gun stories
CNN NEWS
50 anti-gun stories to seven pro gun stories
Out of 300 evening news segments, anti-gun stories outnumbered pro-gun stories by 164 to 20. Overall from July 1 1997 to June 30 1999, in gun policy stories, those advocating more gun control outnumbered stories opposing gun control by 357 to 36, or a ratio of almost 10 to 1, while 260 were categorized as neutral. This does not include the numerous stories on the families’ grief or crime scene investigations that did not include statements relating to gun policy nor does it include the 82 times gun control advocates appeared on morning talk shows to just 37 times for gun-right advocates appeared. In all on morning talk shows, out of 353 gun policy segments, anti-gun stories outnumbered pro-gun stories by 193 to 15, or a ratio of 13 to 1. So the evidence does seem to point to the fact that the news media is very much behind liberal thinking that more gun control is needed.
The million-mom march for gun control became obvious for what it was in just a few short speeches. Wouldn’t it have been nice if they had spent even half the energy and resources to attack the real problem? Sadly, no mention was made of the fact that parents need to stay together and give children a more balanced life. Also, no mention was made of the moral decline of the nation. We the people have stood by and watched our leaders take prayer out of school and the ten commandments, only to see them replaced with condemns and teaching that advocates homosexuality as a normal lifestyle. We have to face the facts, there are those in Washington D. C. that want to disarm the American people and do away with our Constitution. My question is this, Are we Americans going to continue to sit back and let it happen without a fuss?
Sexual Preference
The Hate Crime bill that almost passed in our country not only would have put pressure on law enforcement to protect the African American community but it would also have applied to the homosexual community as well. If you will recall, Clinton came very near getting Hate Crimes Legislation passed. It failed by one vote. Take for instance, Canada where sexual orientation laws are in effect. Any mention of anything that speaks negatively about homosexuality must be edited out of the sermon or it will be illegal. Did you know that religious broadcasters in America can no longer preach Leviticus the 18th chapter, I Corinthians the 6th chapter nor in Romans the I” chapter for that matter all of which God condemns homosexuality as an abominable sin in Canada. A Canadian minister was fined over $6,000 for buying an ad in his own local newspaper where he quoted Leviticus 18:22, which states that homosexuality is a sin. In addition, a mayor of a Canadian city was found to violate a human rights ordinance when she refused to declare “gay day.” Also, in the United Kingdom a minister was fined $35,000 for an ad that described homosexuality as an abomination. Still want to remain silent Christians! Even the Pope had a complaint filed in Dutch court against him for his statement that “homosexual acts are contrary to the laws of nature.” Of course, the Pope has immunity from such but all other priest do not.
The world’s organizers (U.N. Human Rights Commission for one) of this abomination have a well planned out scheme to accomplish their goal of legal recognition of same-sex marriage and finally the right to sodomize your children with you being helpless to legally stop them. First of all, it is necessary to decriminalize homosexuality, (America has done this) then authorize legal recognition of homosexuality, (America has done this) and now the state of Vermont is leading the way for the rest of America to legally recognize same-sex marriages. Take a look at Europe and see how they accomplished this. Oh, so you still think this is far out huh! Read how the homosexuals were after Lot’s children and had it not been for an act of God they would have gotten them and poor Lot would have had to sit by and watch it happen. So the next time you make the statement, “I don’t care what they do as long as they leave me alone,” think about this. Wake up, you who call yourselves Christians and stand up for the righteousness of God. Speak out while there is time, let your leaders in Congress know you will fight the good fight of faith and they will be rejected come next election if they support Hate Crimes Legislation.
Linda Harvey 2001 WorldNetDaily
The most powerful lobbying machine in our country, the National Education Association, will meet next week (last week June 2001) in Los Angeles and vote on a sweeping set of measures to fast-track homosexuality even more swiftly into our nation’s schools.
Some schools now post pink triangles on classrooms they have designated as “safe” for homosexual-sex questions. Students who ask questions in these “safe” places are then linked up with gay activist groups outside the school. And this happens without any call to the student’s home, to warn a parent their precious child is about to jump off a cliff.
What crazed education researcher could possibly believe that teaching children to accept homosexual-sex acts is more important than learning about the U.S. Constitution or about Renaissance architecture? Or even how to spell “m-a-r-r-i-a-g-e?”
Dr. Chuck Baldwin
When the National Education Association holds its annual convention shortly, it will introduce a resolution that condones and promotes homosexuality (as it does every year). Most sex education courses being taught in government schools today unabashedly legitimize and normalize sodomite behavior.
Questionnaire used in a test administered at a Framingham, Massachusetts’s high school__Is it possible heterosexuality is a phase you will grow out of? Is it possible you are heterosexual because you fear the same sex? If you have never slept with anyone of the same sex, how do you know you wouldn’t prefer that? Is it possible you merely need a good gay experience?
Uniting The World
David Rockefeller—Founder and honorary chairman, Council of the Americas. Chairman , Council on Foreign Relations. Founder and Honorary Chairman, Trilateral Commission__We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nation will accept the New World Order. He also said, “Some even believe we (Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
James Paul Warburg—Member, Council on Foreign Relations. Foreign agent of the Rothschild Dynasty. Major player in the Federal Reserve Act scam__We shall have world government whether or not you like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.
Concerning the Council on Foreign Relations, Devvy Kidd in her book Why A Bankrupt America, said, “the CFR’s activities are treasonous to our U.S. Constitution.” They mean to put an end to the United States of America and make our nation part of their global government scheme. Phyllis Schlafly said, “Global treaties and conferences are a direct threat to every American citizen. They are an assault on our right to raise and educate our children as we see fit. They are an attack on our right of ownership of private property.” Barry Goldwater had it figured out way back in 1971. “The time has come to recognize the United Nations for the anti-American, anti-freedom organization that it has become. The time has come for us to cut off financial help, withdraw as a member, and ask the United Nations to find a headquarters location outside the United States that is more in keeping with the philosophy of the major of voting members, someplace like Moscow or Peking.”
If you listen closely to a liberal’s rhetoric, I’m afraid you’ll find many of our liberal friends are indeed willing, often anxious, to relinquish our freedom, the most precious gift ever bestowed upon a people, to an omnipotent government, and to allow this nation’s proud and honorable citizens to be transformed into servitude.
If we the people trade in our God-given rights, which we inherited from our inspired Founding Fathers and their sacrifices, for a set of state-given rights, dispensed by the government in accord with governmental convenience, then we the people will have but ourselves to blame, and the American dream will inexorably become an unimaginable nightmare. In his book ‘None Dare Call It Treason’, John Stormer said, “The battle will be lost, not when freedom of speech is finally taken away, but when Americans become so ‘adjusted’ or ‘conditioned’ to getting along with the group’ that when they finally see the threat, they say, ‘I can’t afford to be controversial.” We the people by inaction, permit powerful politicians and institutions in and out of government to define the government’s reach into our lives, to decide policy which will accrue for the politicians’ own advantage, and to impose ever-increasing limitations on our freedom. We the people prove Dante’s wisdom: “The hottest places in hell are reserved for those, who in times of moral crisis, do nothing.”
You have been given plenty of well-documented examples of the liberal establishment. Many of these as you probably noticed are teaching this propaganda in our major universities and they are all over our public school systems. To hear many of these people talk, it is too late for us to stop them such as the current U.N. General Secretary Kofi Annon who said, “The hell with America, we (U.N.) are already in control.” What this tells me is if we are truly at that point in our destiny as a nation, then one who intends to fight this takeover of our government must be of the same spirit as Patrick Henry who said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” One must believe this with all his heart and soul because it may well be required. We must love freedom more than personal comforts and desires. Patrick Henry said, “They tell us, Sir, that we are weak — unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs, and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of those means, which the God of nature hath placed, in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the Holy cause of Liberty, and in such a country as that which we posses, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave… Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death! ´´
Hillary Clinton’s definition of extremist above, “Extremists are those individuals (conservatives) who insist on clinging to the Founding Fathers vision of America. She and the rest of that liberal bunch of rejects from the sixties and seventies pop/folk, drug culture think (as you well know at this point in reading), that the Founding Father’s inspired writing of the Constitution and Bill of Rights is now null and void. One thing I didn’t spend any time on is the subject of science, but as many of you know by now, selling baby parts has become a big business in America and the world. Stem Cell research from an embryo holds much promise for future cures so says some scientist. True or not, where do we draw the line on what is morally right or wrong. Does this or does it not lend justification to the continued slaughter of the unborn? To prove the point that the Founding Fathers are not obsolete, but quite the contrary are very up to date, listen to what Thomas Jefferson had to say on the subject of science and see the relevance it has for today.
Thomas Jefferson: “I fear from the experience of the last twenty-five years, that morals do not of necessity advance hand in hand with the sciences.”
Dr. Mary Jo Bane—Clinton Administration assistant secretary of administration for children and families in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. We really don’t know how to raise children. In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them.
You have read and now see how the liberal establishment sees you as an individual with such comments as, “Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license.” You have read many comments from the liberals that you will have to admit they don’t have much use for the one true God. Well, listen to one last comment from Thomas Jefferson and he will prove to you they are up to no good as far as we are concerned and what he said back then is still good today.
Thomas Jefferson: Those who have no sense of right, reason or religion, have a natural propensity to make use of their strength to the destruction of such as are weaker than they. Again, right up to snuff, huh!
The Lord said, “ don’t be caught unawares.” I know he wasn’t specifically talking about this, but it definitely applies also because it is God that gave us this great land that so many Americans have bravely died for. Please view some thoughts from our Founding Fathers and you decide for yourself if the liberal establishment’s mentality of today line up with the mentality of our Founding Fathers.
Patrick Henry
“Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is impossible that a nation of infidels or idolaters should be a nation of free men. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom.”
John Quincy Adams
Courage and perseverance have a magical talisman, before which difficulties disappear and obstacles vanish into air.
John Quincy Adams
“So great is my veneration for the Bible that the earlier my children begin to read it the more confident will be my hope that they will prove useful citizens of their country and respectable members of society.”
John Quincy Adams
“I have for many years made it a practice to read through the Bible once every year.”
John Quincy Adams
“I speak as a man of the world to men of the world and I say to you, search the scriptures, the Bible is the book of all others to be read at all ages and in all conditions of human life; not to be read once or twice or thrice through and then laid aside, but to be read in small portions of one or two chapters every day and never to be intermitted unless by some overruling necessity.”
John Quincy Adams
The pretence of an absolute, irresistible, despotic power, existing in every government somewhere, is incompatible with the first principle of natural right. Take for example the right to life. The moment an infant is born, it has a right to the life which it has received from the Creator . . . no human being, no combination of human beings, has the power, I say not the physical, but the moral power, to take a life not so forfeited [by commission of a crime], unless in self-defense or by the laws of war.
John Quincy Adams
Duty is ours; results are God’s. The first and almost the only Book deserving of universal attention is the Bible. In what light we regard the Bible, whether with reference to revelation, to history, or to morality, it is an invaluable and inexhaustible mine of knowledge and virtue.
Benjamin Franklin
“Whatever is begun in anger ends in shame.”
Ben Franklin
“I haven’t failed, I’ve found 10,000 ways that don’t work.”
Ben Franklin
“Energy and persistence conquer all thing. ”
Ben Franklin
“Genius without education is like silver in the mine. ”
Ben Franklin
“I think vital religion has always suffered when orthodoxy is more regarded than virtue. The scriptures assure me that at the last day we shall not be examined on what we thought but what we did.”
Ben Franklin
“I wish it (Christianity) were more productive of good works … I mean real good works … not holy-day keeping, sermon-hearing … or making long prayers, filled with flatteries and compliments despised by wise men, and much less capable of pleasing the Deity.”
Ben Franklin
“If you would persuade, you must appeal to interest rather than intellect.”
Ben Franklin
“Dost thou love life? Then do not squander time; for that’s the stuff life is made of.”
Ben Franklin
“They that will not be counseled, cannot be helped. If you do not hear reason she will rap you on the knuckles.”
Ben Franklin
“He that blows the coals in quarrels that he has nothing to do with, has no right to complain if the sparks fly in his face.”
Ben Franklin
“Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do.”
Ben Franklin
“To be thrown upon one’s own resources, is to be cast into the very lap of fortune; for our faculties then undergo a development and display an energy of which they were previously unsusceptible.”
Ben Franklin
“Hide not your talents. They for use were made. What’s a sundial in the shade.”
Ben Franklin
“Sloth makes all things difficult, but industry, all things easy. He that rises late must trot all day, and shall scarce overtake his business at night, while laziness travels so slowly that poverty soon overtakes him.”
Ben Franklin
“Money never made a man happy yet, nor will it. There is nothing in its nature to produce happiness. The more a man has, the more he wants. Instead of its filling a vacuum, it makes one. If it satisfies one want, it doubles and trebles that want another way. That was a true proverb of the wise man, rely upon it; “Better is little with the fear of the Lord, than great treasure, and trouble therewith.”
Ben Franklin
“Having been poor is no shame, but being ashamed of it, is.”
Ben Franklin
“Experience is a dear teacher, and only fools will learn from no other.”
Patrick Henry
“I know, sir, how well it becomes a liberal man and a Christian to forget and forgive. As individuals professing a holy religion, it is our bounden duty to forgive injuries done us as individuals. But when the character of Christian you add the character of patriot, you are in a different situation. Our mild and holy system of religion inculcates an admirable maxim of forbearance. If your enemy smites one cheek, turn the other to him. But you must stop there. You cannot apply this to your country. As members of a social community, this maxim does not apply to you. When you consider injuries done to your country your political duty tells you of vengeance. Forgive as a private man, but never forgive public injuries. Observations of this nature are exceedingly unpleasant, but it is my duty to use them.”
Patrick Henry
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.”
Thomas Jefferson
“On matters of style, swim with the current, on matters of principle, stand like a rock.”
Thomas Jefferson
“I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”
Thomas Jefferson
“Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude.”
Thomas Jefferson
“A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.”
Thomas Jefferson
“I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion.”
Thomas Jefferson
“I’m a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it.”
George Washington
“Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is a force, like fire: a dangerous servant and a terrible master”.
George Washington, speech of January 7, 1790 in the Boston Independent Chronicle, January 14, 1790.
“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force!”
George Washington
It is substantially true that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government.
George Washington
It is impossible to account for the creation of the universe without the agency of a Supreme Being.
Religion is as necessary to reason as reason is to religion. The one cannot exist without the other. A reasoning being would lose his reason in attempting to account for the great phenomena of nature, had he not a Supreme Being to refer to; and well has it been said, that if there had been no God, mankind would have been obliged to imagine one.
George Washington
I never mean, unless some particular circumstances should compel it, to possess another slave by purchase, it being among my first wishes to see some plan adopted, by which slavery in this country may be abolished by law.
George Washington
No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the affairs of men more than the people of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency.
George Washington
“There is nothing which can better deserve our patronage than the promotion of science and literature. Knowledge is in every country the surest basis of public happiness.”
George Washington
Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth.
George Washington
Ninety-nine percent of the failures come from people who have the habit of making excuses.
Final Note: Either we live by our principles or we don’t have any principles. Conservatives today are letting liberals define them. They are defined by what they are against, more than what they are for. I’m for constitutionally limited government. I’m for freedom, which includes individual rights. I’m for self-government and the rights of Americans to own property, guns or anything else they want to own. I’m for personal responsibility and accountability to God.
Liberalism opposes all of that. That’s why it’s evil. That’s why I am not a liberal. That’s why I’m against the Democratic Party and against any Republicans who buckle under to the whims of Democratic liberals. Despite the fact that there are those who would destroy our great country from within, at present America is still the greatest country in the world to live in. God bless America!
Contributor's website: http://thevoice.name
Content posted by users from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use and each author is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.
One Response to “Liberals Over Ameica”
Leave a Reply
Loading ...Recommended Reading:
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of moral crisis do nothing and many Republicans can count themselves dealt in. Ben Franklin “I think vital religion has always suffered when orthodoxy is more regarded than virtue.