Funny Money Based On Worthless Paper No Better

J.J. Jackson* | December 5, 2008  |

Similar posts:
None Found

I have not always been a proponent of alternative currency to the U.S. Dollar being circulated and being used in the United States for transactions.  Although to date I have not found a truly viable alternate currency (aside from true precious metals like gold, silver, etc.), I have become more and more enamoured by the theory over the past ten years though because the United States has not managed its own money very well.  I think that there is a market for alternative currencies but what some Milwaukee neighborhoods are trying to establish seems to be no better than our current system:

Residents from the Milwaukee neighborhoods of Riverwest and East Side are scheduled to meet Wednesday to discuss printing their own money. The idea is that the local cash could be used at neighborhood stores and businesses, thus encouraging local spending. The result, supporters hope, would be a bustling local economy, even as the rest of the nation deals with a recession.

“You have all these people who have local currency, and they’re going to spend it at local stores,” said Sura Faraj, a community organizer who is helping spearhead the plan. “They can’t spend it at the Wal-Mart or the Home Depot, but they can spend it at their local hardware store or their local grocery store.”

Incentives could be used to entice consumers into using the new money. For example, perhaps they could trade $100 U.S. for $110 local, essentially netting them a 10 percent discount at participating stores.

It’s not a new concept—experts estimate there are at least 2,000 local currencies all over the world—but it is a practice that tends to burgeon during economic downturns. During the Great Depression, scores of communities relied on their own currencies.

And it’s completely legal.

But what these communities are planning on doing is flawed on so many levels.  First of all, they are trying to establish a local currency to benefit their local communities.  But in doing so, they are locking people who use it in to shopping in only local stores.  This means less competition which means less downward pressure on prices.  Not good for anyone with a simple understanding of economics.
Another major problem is that their currency, if $100 US would buy $110 “local”, is worth less than U.S. currency right off the bat.  This means, once again, that prices inflate because ultimately, at some point, the supplier is getting goods and services from people outside of the “local” currency area.  I.e. their $110 “local” only has the buying power of $100 US.
Thirdly, since the “local” currency is tied to the dollar, it’s value is based on the dollar.  In order to be viable, the “local” currency must have an intrinsic value of its own and be backed by the “local” government.  However, in this case it is still being backed by the United States Government by default. 
You just cannot arbitrarily set an exchange rate either.  Like trading your U.S. Dollars for a big screen television, trading U.S. Dollars for “local” dollars must be based on supply and demand.  If people see a value in this new, local currency they will desire it and the exchange rate will go up and it will succeed.  If people do not see a value in this new, local currency they will not desire it and the exchange rate will go down and it will fail.  This is the same way currency exchange rates are set on the world stage (unless you have an authoritarian government like China that fixes their rates).  So this is another strike against this system.
Really, all I see here is a scheme and sadly there is someone that is ultimately floating it because they see a way to better themselves while not solving any real problems.  Its like a shell game.  You put a ball under one of three shells and then mix them up.  But no matter which shell you put the ball under you still only have one ball.  All that changes is where it is.


Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com



*Content posted by this user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source should be cited in either block quotes, with quotes and/or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.

Leave a Reply




On topic and intelligent comments are always welcome as are humorous observations. But liberal talking points with no basis in reality, off topic comments, spam and advertisements are not. Even though you may think you are an intelligent liberal by spouting such things, you probably are not. Keep this in mind as trolling is prohibited and will result in your comments not being approved and comments informing us how much we are a bunch of idiots because you say we are or espousing hate towards the truth are often moved directly to the official “I Hate You/You’re An Idiot” thread. Save us all the time and post there directly if you have a comment that would meet those criteria. Commentators reserve the right to mock claims about how liberal ideas, such as higher taxes, actually work and how conservative and right wingers, are NAZIs, racists, sexists, etc. and will do so with great regularity. By posting a comment you agree to abide by the rules of this site.
  • The Neolibertarian Network

  • American Conservative Daily is owned and operated by J.J. Jackson, President of Land of the Free Studios, Inc.