RSSNEA UPS SODOMY & AIDS
Grant Swank* | March 1, 2008 |
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
“That NEA advocates for the inclusion of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender issues in the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education teacher education program review process।”
That was recommended at the NEA meeting in Orlando. That means that the NEA “recommends that gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender issues be required content for teacher credentialing,” according to AFA Action Alert.
Further, NEA had no doubts about its endorsement of homosexual nuptials and adoptions wherever approved by law.
According to BP: “During the meeting in Orlando, Fla., the NEA amended its B-10 resolution on ‘racism, sexism, sexual orientation and gender identification discrimination’ which said in part, ‘Discrimination and stereotyping based on such factors as race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identification, disability, ethnicity, immigration status, occupation and religion must be eliminated,’ by adding the following paragraph:
““The Association also believes that these factors should not affect the legal rights and obligations of the partners in a legally recognized domestic partnership, civil union, or marriage in regard to matters involving the other partner, such as medical decisions, taxes, inheritance, adoption, and immigration.’
“Currently, seven states have some form of legal recognition for homosexual couples. Massachusetts allows ‘gay marriage,’ Vermont and Connecticut have civil unions, California has domestic partnerships and the District of Columbia, Maine, New Jersey and Hawaii have laws that grant same-sex couples at least some of the legal benefits of marriage.”
In addition, the NEA took out the term “tolerance” regarding homosexuality and supplied “acceptance and respect” concerning such alliances. “The author of New Business Item 52 used this rationale: ‘We should teach acceptance and respect, not tolerance, of those who are different from us wherever appropriate.’”
What is particularly frightening in the light of teachers molesting students today is that NEA would not pass an amendment setting forth protection of pupils from “sexual misconduct by teachers.”
“The amendment read ‘To protect the rights of all students, the Association believes sexual contact between education professionals and minor students is unacceptable.’ The NEA refused to pass the amendment. Many feel that the NEA refused to pass the amendment in order to protect teachers who have sex with students.”
–
Read: http://truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Contributor's website: http://jgrantswankjr.blogspot.com/
*Content posted by this user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source should cited in either block quotes, with quotes and/or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or it's owner.
One Response to “NEA UPS SODOMY & AIDS”
Leave a Reply
On topic and intelligent comments are always welcome as are humorous observations. But liberal talking points with no basis in reality, off topic comments, spam and advertisements are not. Even though you may think you are an intelligent liberal, you probably are not. Keep this in mind as trolling is prohibited and will result in your comments not being approved and comments informing us how much we are a bunch of idiots because you say we are or espousing hate towards the truth are often moved directly to the official “I Hate You/You’re An Idiot” thread. Save us all the time and post there directly if you have a comment that would meet those criteria. Commenters reserve the right to mock claims about how liberal ideas, such as higher taxes, actually work and how conservative and right wingers, are NAZIs, racists, sexists, etc. and will do so with great regularity. By posting a comment you agree to abide by the rules of this site.
Loading ...
-
Recommended Reading:
-
[...] Grant Swank had an interesting blog post (NEA UPS SODOMY & AIDS).Here’s a small excerpt:““The Association also believes that these factors should not affect the legal rights and obligations of the partners in a legally recognized domestic partnership, civil union, or marriage in regard to matters involving the other … [...]