CNN Plants Democrats To Ask Questions At Republican Debate

J.J. Jackson* | November 29, 2007 

Filed Under Liberal Media

On the heals of plants at the last Democrat debate, now it appears that CNN went out of their way to have partisan supporters of SPECIFIC Democratic candidates ask questions of Republican candidates.

Drudge has a great roundup of links discussing this.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/7085.html
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071129/NATION/71129002/1001
http://michellemalkin.com/

Come on do you really expect anything less? Is it a problem that you have people who are obviously against all the candidates on the stage asking questions of them? No it’s not. But at least be honest. If you are a John Edwards supporter because the sight of his hair makes you have orgasms or if you are linked to Hillary Clinton’s campaign be honest and make it known.

It’s odd that after the Democrat CNN/YouTube debate it wasn’t discovered that there were so many Republican plants now isn’t it?

Transcript:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/28/debate.transcript/


Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com




*Content posted by a user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source is cited in either block quotes, with quotes or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or it's owner.

Comments

6 Responses to “CNN Plants Democrats To Ask Questions At Republican Debate”

  1. Peggy McGilligan on November 29th, 2007 11:50 pm

    BILL & HILLARY ACTUALLY SAME CLINTONS WHO OCCUPIED WHITE HOUSE NATION SUDDENLY REALIZES. It’s sad to see Hillary flounder. She had so much promise. I guess getting tangled-up with the wrong man can do that. Oh, wait. Do you suppose the Clintons could influence CNN (The Clinton News Network). Whew, neither did I. Hillary also claims to be big on education, has been for years. Still and all, she never gives specifics, but I’ll bet this weighs heavily on her aspirations: http://theseedsof9-11.com

  2. PinguMama on November 30th, 2007 6:55 am

    Hillary had promise?

    I suppose if you believe in Marxism.

  3. Mark Taylor on November 30th, 2007 4:38 pm

    PinguMama, you don’t seem to recognize subtlety.

  4. RonniesRayGun on December 1st, 2007 9:47 am

    Mark, you don’t seem to recognize sarcasm.

  5. Mark Taylor on December 1st, 2007 11:47 am

    You are right, Ronnie. You and PinguMama are
    sarcastic while Peggy is subtle.

  6. PinguMama on December 1st, 2007 11:58 am

    Please note that my comment was a general statement of fact not directed at anyone in particular. Except the Marxists that support Hillary.

Leave a Reply




By posting a comment you agree to abide by the rules of this site.

  • Archives

  • Recommended Reading:

  • The Neolibertarian Network

American Conservative Daily is owned and operated by J.J. Jackson, President of Land of the Free Studios, Inc.