Q&A: J.J. Jackson Answers Reader Mail (Part 3)

J.J. Jackson* | October 29, 2007

Allan writes:

Sometimes you come off pretty cocky and smug. Don’t Get me wrong, I think you do a great job beating up on the left, but don’t you worry that sometimes you come off a strong?Absolutely not because it is easy to act the way I do when you’re right. I never mince words. I tell you exactly what I think. It is true a lot of people hate that, but ask me if I care.

Jennie writes:

With the way all these liberals are acting and pretending that Rush Limbaugh was lambasting every soldier that disagreed with the war on terror a “phony soldiers” do you think that this is finally the crack-up that will do them in?One thing about liberals is that neither they nor their ideology ever go away. If America were comprised of normal people I would say yes. But the truth is that there is a sizable portion (about 20-30%) of Americans that actually believe whatever talking point is spouted by Harry Reid, Media Matters, MoveOn.org or any other kook moonbat out there without even a question as to its accuracy.

Colin writes:

Does it bother you that people take issue with what you have to say? I found this site by clicking on a link from [site removed] and the author there didn’t exactly have very much nice to say about you. I was wondering if you ever read these sites?Heck no. I don’t read them and 99.9% of the time I don’t even acknowledge their existence because most of the time that is what they want. They want me to recognize their pitiful little site and post something about them in the hopes that they can tap into the readers that come here and are subscribed to my rss feed and help their own cause.

It doesn’t bother me that someone takes issue with what I have to say because what I have to say is backed up by years of experience, is well documented in post after post on this and many other sites and beyond being refuted.

Ron writes:

How quick are you to ban people that disagree with you from posting on your site?Disagreement with me is a not a criteria for being banned. I am more than happy to let people that disagree with me ramble on and show their own ignorance as long as they are not trolling and just being generally obnoxious. It’s when they become belligerent and fueled by something other than reason that people’s posting/commenting privileges are pulled.

However if the first sentence out of your mouth includes calling me a “neo-con” or a “fascist” and being just not ignorant but down right stupid (since neither of those claims can be backed up by any facts) you earn a one way ticket to the sin bin never to be let out.

As RonniesRayGun, one of our regular commenters here, is fond of saying, “When you are serious about holding on to your own ‘facts’ which are not ‘facts’ we have no more use for you.”

Toni writes:

What is the most annoying thing that you have to deal with each and every day?Hands down it is the wanna-bes out there who can’t get enough people to subscribe to their email lists voluntarily and just add me because they think that I give a damn about what they have to say.

A close second would be people that have a higher opinion of themselves than is warranted and keep writing me and DEMANDING that I respond to their conspiracy theories about the Skull & Bones, September 11^th and the Free Masons. Boy, they really do get testy when you would rather laugh at them then kill off 99% of your brain arguing with them.

Marc writes:

Huzzah! I’m so glad that I found you! I thought I was the only one out there who believed like you did! I’m glad to know that there are still true libertarians out there! Keep the insights coming!Thanks.

Kurt writes:

Great, another damn neo-con with a website! Don’t you fools ever get tired of promoting your anti-American agenda?I was unaware that supporting the Constitution, small and limited government, the unalienable rights of mankind as well as the right of the United States to protect itself from all threats foreign and domestic was now “anti-American”.

Apparently you have an agenda other than the truth you are seeking to promote.

FYI, you can visit the last poll run on my personal site (Liberty Reborn) to see what people without an agenda actually think of my opinions. Hmmm … notice “Libertarian” is top on that list and “neo-con” is near the bottom with very few supporters.

I’m going to guess that you are either a liberal who has no reading comprehension or you are one of those faux libertarians who believe that an isolationist, non-interventionist foreign policy is actually what our founding fathers believed in, preached and practiced.

Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com

*Content posted by a user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source is cited in either block quotes, with quotes or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or it's owner.