Is it Amnesty? Yes. It is.

J.J. Jackson* | May 25, 2007  |

Filed Under Immigration
Similar posts:
None Found

There are some Chomsky-esque, center-right leaning wordsmiths out there too. Believe it. Particularly when it comes to the latest attempt at giving amnesty (and the Senate bill IS Amnesty). And I can prove it by simply using the words as they are defined.

Let’s begin:

Amnesty: “the act of an authority (as a government) by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals” (source: Websters)

Ok, what does “pardon” mean?

Pardon: “1 : INDULGENCE 1
2 : the excusing of an offense without exacting a penalty
3 a : a release from the legal penalties of an offense b : an official warrant of remission of penalty
4 : excuse or forgiveness for a fault, offense, or discourtesy (source: Websters)

Ok, so that makes the definition of amnesty “the act of an authority (as a government) by which indulgence is granted to a large group of individuals.”Ok, what is an “indulgence”?

Indulgence: “1 : remission of part or all of the temporal and especially purgatorial punishment that according to Roman Catholicism is due for sins whose eternal punishment has been remitted and whose guilt has been pardoned (as through the sacrament of reconciliation)
2 : the act of indulging : the state of being indulgent
3 a : an indulgent act b : an extension of time for payment or performance granted as a favor
4 a : the act of indulging in something; especially : SELF-INDULGENCE b : something indulged in ” (source: Websers)

Also, to “indulge” means “to treat with excessive leniency, generosity, or consideration”

So an “indulgence” is an “excuse” or “way out” (synonym: lenient).  So “indulgence” is basically when “part or all of the punishment has been remitted” giving us amnesty defined as: “the act of an authority (as a government) by which part or all of the punishment has been remitted to a large group of individuals.”

Notice that an indulgence is when “part” OR “all” of the punishment is remitted. The important word here is “part”.

This is a fairly simple skill that we all learned in grade school; that the definition or one word can be inserted into the definition of another word defined by using it. And it clearly defines the act of rewriting the current laws for which certain punishments are due to change that punishment as indeed being AMNESTY.

So sorry.

The fact is the current law has penalties and this Senate bill serves the purpose of granting illegal aliens amnesty from those penalties.


Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com



*Content posted by this user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source should be cited in either block quotes, with quotes and/or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.

2 Responses to “Is it Amnesty? Yes. It is.”

  1. Red Tornado on May 25th, 2007 7:01 pm

    Great work making it so simple even a caveman can understand it.

  2. TriggerMama on May 31st, 2007 6:13 am

    Excellent and PERFECTLY sound reasoning. Too bad too many people are clearly unsound in their desire to have something that they so desperately want.

Leave a Reply




On topic and intelligent comments are always welcome as are humorous observations. But liberal talking points with no basis in reality, off topic comments, spam and advertisements are not. Even though you may think you are an intelligent liberal by spouting such things, you probably are not. Keep this in mind as trolling is prohibited and will result in your comments not being approved and comments informing us how much we are a bunch of idiots because you say we are or espousing hate towards the truth are often moved directly to the official “I Hate You/You’re An Idiot” thread. Save us all the time and post there directly if you have a comment that would meet those criteria. Commentators reserve the right to mock claims about how liberal ideas, such as higher taxes, actually work and how conservative and right wingers, are NAZIs, racists, sexists, etc. and will do so with great regularity. By posting a comment you agree to abide by the rules of this site.
  • Recommended Reading:

  • The Neolibertarian Network

  • American Conservative Daily is owned and operated by J.J. Jackson, President of Land of the Free Studios, Inc.