CRAP! Another Scientist Disagreeing With The Global Warming Alarmists!

J.J. Jackson* | April 10, 2007 

I know it is repetitive, but I’ll say it again. Consensus? WHAT CONSENSUS? Don’t believe me? Check out the latest article by this Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology:

April 16, 2007 issue - Judging from the media in recent months, the debate over global warming is now over. There has been a net warming of the earth over the last century and a half, and our greenhouse gas emissions are contributing at some level. Both of these statements are almost certainly true. What of it? Recently many people have said that the earth is facing a crisis requiring urgent action. This statement has nothing to do with science. There is no compelling evidence that the warming trend we’ve seen will amount to anything close to catastrophe. What most commentators—and many scientists—seem to miss is that the only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes. The earth is always warming or cooling by as much as a few tenths of a degree a year; periods of constant average temperatures are rare. Looking back on the earth’s climate history, it’s apparent that there’s no such thing as an optimal temperature—a climate at which everything is just right. The current alarm rests on the false assumption not only that we live in a perfect world, temperaturewise, but also that our warming forecasts for the year 2040 are somehow more reliable than the weatherman’s forecast for next week. A warmer climate could prove to be more beneficial than the one we have now. Much of the alarm over climate change is based on ignorance of what is normal for weather and climate. There is no evidence, for instance, that extreme weather events are increasing in any systematic way, according to scientists at the U.S. National Hurricane Center, the World Meteorological Organization and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (which released the second part of this year’s report earlier this month). Indeed, meteorological theory holds that, outside the tropics, weather in a warming world should be less variable, which might be a good thing.

It must be getting more and more lonely in Liberal La La Land as it becomes more and more obvious that there are a heck of a lot fewer people living there than the lefties originally thought.

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism)Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 YearsShattered Consensus: The True State of Global WarmingThe Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World


Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com




*Content posted by a user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source is cited in either block quotes, with quotes or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or it's owner.

One Response to “CRAP! Another Scientist Disagreeing With The Global Warming Alarmists!”

  1. Best Posts from around the Web » CRAP! Another Scientist Disagreeing With The Global Warming Alarmists! on April 10th, 2007 7:59 pm

    [...] Original post by J.J. Jackson [...]

Leave a Reply




By posting a comment you agree to abide by the rules of this site.

American Conservative Daily is owned and operated by J.J. Jackson, President of Land of the Free Studios, Inc.