RSSMichelle Malkin Presents Amanda Marcotte
J.J. Jackson* | February 10, 2007 |
Filed Under Eyes on 2008, Liberals
Ok, so I’m a couple days late on linking to this but it is just absolutely funny and a prime example of how liberals act. Check out the Video over at Hot Air where Michelle Malkin reads actual excerts from John Edward’s moonbat blogmistress.
It’s freaking funny!
Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com
*Content posted by this user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source should be cited in either block quotes, with quotes and/or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or its owner.
4 Responses to “Michelle Malkin Presents Amanda Marcotte”
Leave a Reply
On topic and intelligent comments are always welcome as are humorous observations. But liberal talking points with no basis in reality, off topic comments, spam and advertisements are not. Even though you may think you are an intelligent liberal by spouting such things, you probably are not. Keep this in mind as trolling is prohibited and will result in your comments not being approved and comments informing us how much we are a bunch of idiots because you say we are or espousing hate towards the truth are often moved directly to the official “I Hate You/You’re An Idiot” thread. Save us all the time and post there directly if you have a comment that would meet those criteria. Commentators reserve the right to mock claims about how liberal ideas, such as higher taxes, actually work and how conservative and right wingers, are NAZIs, racists, sexists, etc. and will do so with great regularity. By posting a comment you agree to abide by the rules of this site.-
Loading ... Recommended Reading:
THAT’S AWESOME!
That was pretty funny. When she isn’t cut off by some TV-host she actually does well. Wondering why it’s self-censored though, anyone know?
I think ammonius that it is “self-censored” for artistic effect to draw extra attention to the ravings of the mad woman she was quoting
Tony, that makes sense. Still, as an “artistic effect” its a bit overdone (South Park has pretty much made an industry out of it), it’s a bit wanting. The posts were ridiculous enough with the context-resetting of Malkin’s reading without the bleep. I would’ve gone with the swearing in a pretentiously fake English accent (Madonna style).