Valerie Plame And Liberal Moonbats Focus on Armitage
J.J. Jackson* | September 14, 2006
The Plot Thickens…
Papers Say Richard Armitage Told CIA Agent’s Identity To Bob Novak
(CBS/AP) Syndicated columnist Robert Novak has turned on his own source. Novak says Richard Armitage, the man who told him Valerie Plame was a CIA agent, didn’t disclose her identity in a casual manner, and instead urged him to make her a column item. … - CBS News
And the moonbats ATTACK!
Valerie Plame is spraying bullets hoping to hit the broadside of the barn.
Outed CIA agent Plame adds Armitage to lawsuit“WASHINGTON (CNN) — Ex-CIA agent Valerie Plame has added Richard Armitage to her lawsuit over the 2003 leak that exposed her secret status with the agency to journalists, her lawyers said Wednesday.
The move comes less than a week after the former deputy secretary of state acknowledged that he was the long-undisclosed source in an op-ed piece by columnist Robert Novak.
Novak published Plame’s name in July 2003 after her husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, raised questions about a key element of the Bush administration’s justification for going to war in Iraq — that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium in the central African nation of Niger.
The article set off a lengthy federal investigation that eventually ensnared Vice President Dick Cheney’s then-chief of staff Lewis “Scooter” Libby, who has been charged with perjury, obstruction of justice and lying to investigators about his discussions with journalists about Plame.
Libby has denied wrongdoing and has pleaded not guilty.
Armitage’s disclosure — which he says was unintentional — violated Plame’s privacy and ruined her career, court papers said, but Armitage was not included in the conspiracy accusations being leveled against Cheney, Libby and Karl Rove, President Bush’s top political adviser.”
Plame says the trio blew Plame’s cover in retaliation for Wilson speaking out against the war.
Then there is moonbat Melanie Sloan who said:”The addition of Armitage as a defendant in no way reduces the culpability of the three original defendants,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonprofit watchdog group that is representing the couple” - CNN
You’re right Ms. Sloan. It doesn’t reduce their culpability. After all you cannot reduce culpability less than 0%!
![]() |
(Book)
Authors:Michelle Malkin
Manufacturer:Regnery Publishing, Inc. Released:24 October, 2005 |
![]() |
(Book)
Authors:Gregg Jackson
Manufacturer:JAJ Publishing Released:18 July, 2006 |
Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com
*Content posted by a user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source is cited in either block quotes, with quotes or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or it's owner.
Comments
Leave a Reply
By posting a comment you agree to abide by the rules of this site.
RSS












