NPLAC ‘Hits The Nail On The Head!’

J.J. Jackson* | December 12, 2005

“Pro-abortionists have spoken often over the past few months of the importance of precedent, and stressed that a decision, once handed down by the Supreme Court, is settled law,” observed Stephen G. Peroutka, NPLAC chairman and a Maryland attorney. “But their unwavering attacks on Joe Scheidler and complete disregard for the High Court’s 2003 decision in his favor shows that the only decisions they are willing to ‘recognize’ are those that favor their depraved agenda, and that they have nothing but contempt for our constitutional form of law.” - U.S. Newswire Novmber 30, 2005.

Pro-abortionists first contempt for constitutional law lies in the U.S. Constitution itself. The United States Constitution gives each person the right to be alive and not have that right taken away without due process. It falls under that whole ‘Fifth Amendment thing. Here is but a quote:

nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; - U.S. Constituton.net

Is there any due process in an abortion? What law has an unborn child broken? When did it become against the law for a child to be conceived?

Does one have to be ‘viable’ to be protected under the Constitution?

Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com

*Content posted by a user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source is cited in either block quotes, with quotes or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or it's owner.