Rabid Evolutionists Admit They Don’t Have Case Against Creationism?

Posted By: J.J. Jackson* on July 27, 2005

Darwin defender retracts accusations
Eugenie Scott responds to lawsuit by parent-activist
Posted: July 26, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern

? 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

Eugenie Scott (Photo: National Center for Science Education)
Responding to a lawsuit, the California Academy of Sciences published a letter by leading Darwinist educator Eugenie C. Scott retracting her false claims against a parent-activist who wants to change how a state school district teaches evolution.

The academy agreed to publish Scott’s letter and one by Caldwell in the summer edition of its California Wild magazine.

In a lawsuit filed against Scott and her Oakland, Calif.-based National Center for Science Education in April, Caldwell had claimed that Scott’s article, entitled “In My Backyard: Creationism in California,” contained numerous factual misstatements and libeled him in an effort to discredit efforts to promote his “Quality Science Education” policy. Calwell’s aim is to include some of the scientific weaknesses of Darwin’s theory of evolution in biology classes, without introducing religious content.

Also:
“So why do Eugenie Scott and her National Center for Science Education feel the need to resort to such science fiction in order to prevail in this debate? Are the arguments in favor of their position really that weak?” That is a GOOD QUESTION!

Contributor's website: http://www.libertyreborn.com

Similar posts:

*Content posted by a user may not be completely written by that user. Content from another source is cited in either block quotes, with quotes or with a link to the original material. Content from other sites is posted for commentary and news purposes under fair use. Each user is responsible for their own postings and a particular posting should not be construed as being endorsed by this site or it's owner.